aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-07-16 14:52:16 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-07-16 14:53:30 +0200
commit17943f77bda22d515e29662d31c8ac936b85f470 (patch)
treecd78e29d2ec85377ad98ee3048a49dfa3b68849c
parent171b03de065dae94ed6beb5db9ba7f08e92e7c7c (diff)
parent89e70f9d7fe384ef9de4fa3828d4c80523290186 (diff)
Merge #13652: rpc: Fix that CWallet::AbandonTransaction would leave the grandchildren, etc. active
89e70f9d7fe384ef9de4fa3828d4c80523290186 Fix that CWallet::AbandonTransaction would only traverse one level (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: Prior to this change, it would mark only the first layer of child transactions abandoned, due to always following the input `hashTx` rather than the current `now` tx. Tree-SHA512: df068b49637d299ad73237c7244005fe5aa966d6beae57aff12e6948f173d9381e1b5d08533f7e3a1416991ed57f9f1f7b834057141d85c07dc60bb1f0872cea
-rw-r--r--src/wallet/wallet.cpp2
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py12
2 files changed, 11 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/wallet/wallet.cpp b/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
index 38f4de9633..067015c006 100644
--- a/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ bool CWallet::AbandonTransaction(const uint256& hashTx)
batch.WriteTx(wtx);
NotifyTransactionChanged(this, wtx.GetHash(), CT_UPDATED);
// Iterate over all its outputs, and mark transactions in the wallet that spend them abandoned too
- TxSpends::const_iterator iter = mapTxSpends.lower_bound(COutPoint(hashTx, 0));
+ TxSpends::const_iterator iter = mapTxSpends.lower_bound(COutPoint(now, 0));
while (iter != mapTxSpends.end() && iter->first.hash == now) {
if (!done.count(iter->second)) {
todo.insert(iter->second);
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
index d5ef08d782..cf2120d4eb 100755
--- a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
@@ -70,9 +70,17 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
+ # Create a child tx spending ABC2
+ signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
+ inputs = [ {"txid":txABC2, "vout":0} ]
+ outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change }
+ signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
+ # note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
+ self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
+
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
- assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + Decimal("24.9996"))
+ assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
balance = newbalance
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
@@ -87,7 +95,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
- assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
+ assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
# up in unconfirmed balance
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()