diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2020-07-16 13:03:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2020-07-16 13:03:49 +0200 |
| commit | 0f6900e780afb9c176cf7d1da4a1fc0ca6c9118a (patch) | |
| tree | e3207a07f1beaaceaedf54a11dc4f8917520bcc6 | |
| parent | 6a53c3e390666e37322d6cddd8af2b09b750463d (diff) | |
| parent | f58c4b538ebd67fcfea0a4aff5e062fd59fb19f5 (diff) | |
Merge #19533: [tests] Remove unnecessary cs_mains in denialofservice_tests
f58c4b538ebd67fcfea0a4aff5e062fd59fb19f5 [tests] Remove unnecessary cs_mains in denialofservice_tests (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
9fdf05d70cac4a62d1aeeb4299e2c3a9a866f8af resolved some lock
inversion warnings in denialofservice_tests, but left in a number
of cs_main locks that are unnecessary (introducing lock inversion
warnings in future changes).
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK f58c4b538ebd67fcfea0a4aff5e062fd59fb19f5.
jonatack:
ACK f58c4b538ebd67fcfe verified the test locks correspond to the locks in net/net_processing, and the debug build is clean/unit tests pass.
Tree-SHA512: de2d9b2a8f08081b2ce31e18585e4677b167a11752b797d790c281575d7dfef3587f8be4fc7f8f16771141b6ff0b0145c7488cf30e79256b0043947c67a6182c
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp | 18 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp index d49b51926c..fdc63cd70e 100644 --- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp @@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) // Test starts here { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in getheaders } { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_vSend); + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend); BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear(); } @@ -111,17 +111,17 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction) // Wait 21 minutes SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60); { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in getheaders } { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_vSend); + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend); BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0); } // Wait 3 more minutes SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60); { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in disconnect } BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true); @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); // Should be discouraged } { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); } BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1); } { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2)); } BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr2)); // 2 not discouraged yet... @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 1); // 2 reaches discouragement threshold } { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2)); } BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); // Expect both 1 and 2 @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); } { - LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing); + LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode)); } BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr)); |