Merge #8872: Remove block-request logic from INV message processing

037159c Remove block-request logic from INV message processing (Matt Corallo)
3451203 [qa] Respond to getheaders and do not assume a getdata on inv (Matt Corallo)
d768f15 [qa] Make comptool push blocks instead of relying on inv-fetch (mrbandrews)

5 files changed, 46 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py b/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py
index e0b72e6840..ab4b809ded 100755
--- a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py
+++ b/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ class TestNode(SingleNodeConnCB):
         self.last_cmpctblock = None
         self.block_announced = False
         self.last_getdata = None
+        self.last_getheaders = None
         self.last_getblocktxn = None
         self.last_block = None
         self.last_blocktxn = None
@@ -64,6 +65,9 @@ class TestNode(SingleNodeConnCB):
     def on_getdata(self, conn, message):
         self.last_getdata = message
 
+    def on_getheaders(self, conn, message):
+        self.last_getheaders = message
+
     def on_getblocktxn(self, conn, message):
         self.last_getblocktxn = message
 
@@ -396,6 +400,9 @@ class CompactBlocksTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
 
             if announce == "inv":
                 test_node.send_message(msg_inv([CInv(2, block.sha256)]))
+                success = wait_until(lambda: test_node.last_getheaders is not None, timeout=30)
+                assert(success)
+                test_node.send_header_for_blocks([block])
             else:
                 test_node.send_header_for_blocks([block])
             success = wait_until(lambda: test_node.last_getdata is not None, timeout=30)
diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-segwit.py b/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-segwit.py
index 09ab1b80fc..6ecd84c3f0 100755
--- a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-segwit.py
+++ b/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-segwit.py
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB):
             self.getdataset.add(inv.hash)
         self.last_getdata = message
 
+    def on_getheaders(self, conn, message):
+        self.last_getheaders = message
+
     def on_pong(self, conn, message):
         self.last_pong = message
 
@@ -97,6 +100,10 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB):
         test_function = lambda: self.last_getdata != None
         self.sync(test_function, timeout)
 
+    def wait_for_getheaders(self, timeout=60):
+        test_function = lambda: self.last_getheaders != None
+        self.sync(test_function, timeout)
+
     def wait_for_inv(self, expected_inv, timeout=60):
         test_function = lambda: self.last_inv != expected_inv
         self.sync(test_function, timeout)
@@ -111,12 +118,15 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB):
     def announce_block_and_wait_for_getdata(self, block, use_header, timeout=60):
         with mininode_lock:
             self.last_getdata = None
+            self.last_getheaders = None
+        msg = msg_headers()
+        msg.headers = [ CBlockHeader(block) ]
         if use_header:
-            msg = msg_headers()
-            msg.headers = [ CBlockHeader(block) ]
             self.send_message(msg)
         else:
             self.send_message(msg_inv(inv=[CInv(2, block.sha256)]))
+            self.wait_for_getheaders()
+            self.send_message(msg)
         self.wait_for_getdata()
         return
 
diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/sendheaders.py b/qa/rpc-tests/sendheaders.py
index 81b2442e6a..37b98c576e 100755
--- a/qa/rpc-tests/sendheaders.py
+++ b/qa/rpc-tests/sendheaders.py
@@ -348,14 +348,13 @@ class SendHeadersTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
                 if j == 0:
                     # Announce via inv
                     test_node.send_block_inv(tip)
-                    test_node.wait_for_getdata([tip], timeout=5)
+                    test_node.wait_for_getheaders(timeout=5)
+                    # Should have received a getheaders now
+                    test_node.send_header_for_blocks(blocks)
                     # Test that duplicate inv's won't result in duplicate
                     # getdata requests, or duplicate headers announcements
-                    inv_node.send_block_inv(tip)
-                    # Should have received a getheaders as well!
-                    test_node.send_header_for_blocks(blocks)
-                    test_node.wait_for_getdata([x.sha256 for x in blocks[0:-1]], timeout=5)
-                    [ inv_node.send_block_inv(x.sha256) for x in blocks[0:-1] ]
+                    [ inv_node.send_block_inv(x.sha256) for x in blocks ]
+                    test_node.wait_for_getdata([x.sha256 for x in blocks], timeout=5)
                     inv_node.sync_with_ping()
                 else:
                     # Announce via headers
diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/comptool.py b/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/comptool.py
index 7c92d3f828..17679fc7e1 100755
--- a/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/comptool.py
+++ b/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/comptool.py
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ class TestNode(NodeConnCB):
         m.locator = self.block_store.get_locator(self.bestblockhash)
         self.conn.send_message(m)
 
+    def send_header(self, header):
+        m = msg_headers()
+        m.headers.append(header)
+        self.conn.send_message(m)
+
     # This assumes BIP31
     def send_ping(self, nonce):
         self.pingMap[nonce] = True
@@ -345,8 +350,16 @@ class TestManager(object):
                     # Either send inv's to each node and sync, or add
                     # to invqueue for later inv'ing.
                     if (test_instance.sync_every_block):
-                        [ c.cb.send_inv(block) for c in self.connections ]
-                        self.sync_blocks(block.sha256, 1)
+                        # if we expect success, send inv and sync every block
+                        # if we expect failure, just push the block and see what happens.
+                        if outcome == True:
+                            [ c.cb.send_inv(block) for c in self.connections ]
+                            self.sync_blocks(block.sha256, 1)
+                        else:
+                            [ c.send_message(msg_block(block)) for c in self.connections ]
+                            [ c.cb.send_ping(self.ping_counter) for c in self.connections ]
+                            self.wait_for_pings(self.ping_counter)
+                            self.ping_counter += 1
                         if (not self.check_results(tip, outcome)):
                             raise AssertionError("Test failed at test %d" % test_number)
                     else:
@@ -354,6 +367,8 @@ class TestManager(object):
                 elif isinstance(b_or_t, CBlockHeader):
                     block_header = b_or_t
                     self.block_store.add_header(block_header)
+                    [ c.cb.send_header(block_header) for c in self.connections ]
+
                 else:  # Tx test runner
                     assert(isinstance(b_or_t, CTransaction))
                     tx = b_or_t
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index 52f53ce87a..4293a6bebf 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -5370,28 +5370,12 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
             if (inv.type == MSG_BLOCK) {
                 UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom->GetId(), inv.hash);
                 if (!fAlreadyHave && !fImporting && !fReindex && !mapBlocksInFlight.count(inv.hash)) {
-                    // First request the headers preceding the announced block. In the normal fully-synced
-                    // case where a new block is announced that succeeds the current tip (no reorganization),
-                    // there are no such headers.
-                    // Secondly, and only when we are close to being synced, we request the announced block directly,
-                    // to avoid an extra round-trip. Note that we must *first* ask for the headers, so by the
-                    // time the block arrives, the header chain leading up to it is already validated. Not
-                    // doing this will result in the received block being rejected as an orphan in case it is
-                    // not a direct successor.
+                    // We used to request the full block here, but since headers-announcements are now the
+                    // primary method of announcement on the network, and since, in the case that a node
+                    // fell back to inv we probably have a reorg which we should get the headers for first,
+                    // we now only provide a getheaders response here. When we receive the headers, we will
+                    // then ask for the blocks we need.
                     connman.PushMessage(pfrom, NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(pindexBestHeader), inv.hash);
-                    CNodeState *nodestate = State(pfrom->GetId());
-                    if (CanDirectFetch(chainparams.GetConsensus()) &&
-                        nodestate->nBlocksInFlight < MAX_BLOCKS_IN_TRANSIT_PER_PEER &&
-                        (!IsWitnessEnabled(chainActive.Tip(), chainparams.GetConsensus()) || State(pfrom->GetId())->fHaveWitness)) {
-                        inv.type |= nFetchFlags;
-                        if (nodestate->fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion)
-                            vToFetch.push_back(CInv(MSG_CMPCT_BLOCK, inv.hash));
-                        else
-                            vToFetch.push_back(inv);
-                        // Mark block as in flight already, even though the actual "getdata" message only goes out
-                        // later (within the same cs_main lock, though).
-                        MarkBlockAsInFlight(pfrom->GetId(), inv.hash, chainparams.GetConsensus());
-                    }
                     LogPrint("net", "getheaders (%d) %s to peer=%d\n", pindexBestHeader->nHeight, inv.hash.ToString(), pfrom->id);
                 }
             }