Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Empty addresses should be valid for compatibility with BIP 72.
Empty query parameters should also be valid, since they are harmless,
and clients already accept them.
With these changes, bitcoin:?& would be a valid (but useless) URI.
|
|
The "bitcoin:" URI scheme needs to be case-insensitive according to the RFC,
but the query parameters should be case-sensitive according to the bitcoin-qt
client implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The URI syntax uses an ampersand to separate query parameters,
but the ABNF grammar didn't reflect this fact.
Also, the type of grammar used here is "ABNF" and not "BNF".
|
|
|
|
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=BIP_0021&oldid=37974
|
|
|