Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2016-03-07 | Small typo in bip-0009.mediawiki | Jonathan Cross | |
2016-03-02 | Correct the claim that only 29 bits are available anyway | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Recommend a fallow pause explicitly | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Clarify things and make notation more consistent | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Make the threshold independent from the deployment | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Remove ABANDONED and fix ambiguity | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Rewrite state transition logic | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Update former BIP references and consistency | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Add start time | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Merge pull request #219 from CodeShark/BIP0009_revisions | Luke-Jr | |
Added clarifications to BIP0009. | |||
2016-02-03 | Lots of formatting fixes | Luke Dashjr | |
2015-11-28 | Removed deploytime parameter. | Eric Lombrozo | |
2015-11-17 | Added parameters for specification to BIP0009. | Eric Lombrozo | |
2015-10-02 | BIP 009: Minor revision to extend bit into lockin period. | Rusty Russell | |
As discussed here: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011275.html Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | |||
2015-09-27 | More btcdrak feedback. | Rusty Russell | |
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | |||
2015-09-25 | Bip number assigned: 9. | Rusty Russell | |
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |