slackcoder/bips - Bitcoin Improvement Proposals

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2016-03-30	BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit order	Luke Dashjr

2016-03-15	Small improvements to BIP0009	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-15	BIP9: More explicit recommendations on values.	Rusty Russell
	Basically the same thing reworded as a checklist, with 3 years turned into 1, and suggesting a 1 month delay after expected deployment date. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2016-03-15	bip9: fix heading levels.	Rusty Russell
	It goes from level 2 (specification) to 4; those headings should be level 3. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2016-03-07	Small typo in bip-0009.mediawiki	Jonathan Cross

2016-03-02	Correct the claim that only 29 bits are available anyway	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-02	Recommend a fallow pause explicitly	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-02	Clarify things and make notation more consistent	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-02	Make the threshold independent from the deployment	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-02	Remove ABANDONED and fix ambiguity	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-01	Rewrite state transition logic	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-01	Update former BIP references and consistency	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-01	Add start time	Pieter Wuille

2016-03-01	Merge pull request #219 from CodeShark/BIP0009_revisions	Luke-Jr
	Added clarifications to BIP0009.
2016-02-03	Lots of formatting fixes	Luke Dashjr

2015-11-28	Removed deploytime parameter.	Eric Lombrozo

2015-11-17	Added parameters for specification to BIP0009.	Eric Lombrozo

2015-10-02	BIP 009: Minor revision to extend bit into lockin period.	Rusty Russell
	As discussed here: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011275.html Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2015-09-27	More btcdrak feedback.	Rusty Russell
	Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2015-09-25	Bip number assigned: 9.	Rusty Russell
	Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>