Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2016-08-20 | Promote BIP 9 Draft->Final | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-06-20 | Clarify BIP9 threshold | Johnson Lau | |
The threshold for should be ≥2016 for mainnet, ≥1512 for testnet. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.12.1/src/versionbits.cpp#L69 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.12.1/src/chainparams.cpp#L84 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.12.1/src/chainparams.cpp#L177 | |||
2016-06-01 | Fix typo on link to assignments | Chris Wheeler | |
2016-05-31 | Merge pull request #386 from btcdrak/bip9assign | Luke-Jr | |
Add BIP9 assignments | |||
2016-05-22 | bip-0009: Remove n/a paragraph | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | Replace "rules/force" mutation with a "cannot be ignored" prefix to rule names | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: rules/force mutation | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: Clarify GBT "version" | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: Use simple Yes/No rather than templates (which don't work on GitHub) | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: Switch to rules/vbavailable/vbrequired GBT interface | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | bip-0009: Recommend name "bipN" | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: GBT specification | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: Add softfork deployment "name" | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-22 | BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit order | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-17 | Less visible error | Steven Roose | |
2016-05-14 | Error in BIP0009 code | Steven Roose | |
2016-05-14 | BIP0009 code syntax fix | Steven Roose | |
2016-05-07 | Add BIP9 assignments | BtcDrak | |
2016-03-15 | Small improvements to BIP0009 | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-15 | BIP9: More explicit recommendations on values. | Rusty Russell | |
Basically the same thing reworded as a checklist, with 3 years turned into 1, and suggesting a 1 month delay after expected deployment date. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | |||
2016-03-15 | bip9: fix heading levels. | Rusty Russell | |
It goes from level 2 (specification) to 4; those headings should be level 3. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | |||
2016-03-07 | Small typo in bip-0009.mediawiki | Jonathan Cross | |
2016-03-02 | Correct the claim that only 29 bits are available anyway | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Recommend a fallow pause explicitly | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Clarify things and make notation more consistent | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Make the threshold independent from the deployment | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-02 | Remove ABANDONED and fix ambiguity | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Rewrite state transition logic | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Update former BIP references and consistency | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Add start time | Pieter Wuille | |
2016-03-01 | Merge pull request #219 from CodeShark/BIP0009_revisions | Luke-Jr | |
Added clarifications to BIP0009. | |||
2016-02-03 | Lots of formatting fixes | Luke Dashjr | |
2015-11-28 | Removed deploytime parameter. | Eric Lombrozo | |
2015-11-17 | Added parameters for specification to BIP0009. | Eric Lombrozo | |
2015-10-02 | BIP 009: Minor revision to extend bit into lockin period. | Rusty Russell | |
As discussed here: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011275.html Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | |||
2015-09-27 | More btcdrak feedback. | Rusty Russell | |
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | |||
2015-09-25 | Bip number assigned: 9. | Rusty Russell | |
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |