summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bip-0009.mediawiki
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-11-30Promote BIP 2 Draft->Active, and implement itLuke Dashjr
- Update all Accepted status to Proposed (renamed status) - The BIP Comments preamble headers added to every BIP - The License preamble headers have been added to all BIPs with a Copyright section
2016-08-20Promote BIP 9 Draft->FinalLuke Dashjr
2016-06-20Clarify BIP9 thresholdJohnson Lau
The threshold for should be ≥2016 for mainnet, ≥1512 for testnet. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.12.1/src/versionbits.cpp#L69 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.12.1/src/chainparams.cpp#L84 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.12.1/src/chainparams.cpp#L177
2016-06-01Fix typo on link to assignmentsChris Wheeler
2016-05-31Merge pull request #386 from btcdrak/bip9assignLuke-Jr
Add BIP9 assignments
2016-05-22bip-0009: Remove n/a paragraphLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22Replace "rules/force" mutation with a "cannot be ignored" prefix to rule namesLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: rules/force mutationLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Clarify GBT "version"Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Use simple Yes/No rather than templates (which don't work on GitHub)Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Switch to rules/vbavailable/vbrequired GBT interfaceLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22bip-0009: Recommend name "bipN"Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: GBT specificationLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Add softfork deployment "name"Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit orderLuke Dashjr
2016-05-17Less visible errorSteven Roose
2016-05-14Error in BIP0009 codeSteven Roose
2016-05-14BIP0009 code syntax fixSteven Roose
2016-05-07Add BIP9 assignmentsBtcDrak
2016-03-15Small improvements to BIP0009Pieter Wuille
2016-03-15BIP9: More explicit recommendations on values.Rusty Russell
Basically the same thing reworded as a checklist, with 3 years turned into 1, and suggesting a 1 month delay after expected deployment date. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2016-03-15bip9: fix heading levels.Rusty Russell
It goes from level 2 (specification) to 4; those headings should be level 3. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2016-03-07Small typo in bip-0009.mediawikiJonathan Cross
2016-03-02Correct the claim that only 29 bits are available anywayPieter Wuille
2016-03-02Recommend a fallow pause explicitlyPieter Wuille
2016-03-02Clarify things and make notation more consistentPieter Wuille
2016-03-02Make the threshold independent from the deploymentPieter Wuille
2016-03-02Remove ABANDONED and fix ambiguityPieter Wuille
2016-03-01Rewrite state transition logicPieter Wuille
2016-03-01Update former BIP references and consistencyPieter Wuille
2016-03-01Add start timePieter Wuille
2016-03-01Merge pull request #219 from CodeShark/BIP0009_revisionsLuke-Jr
Added clarifications to BIP0009.
2016-02-03Lots of formatting fixesLuke Dashjr
2015-11-28Removed deploytime parameter.Eric Lombrozo
2015-11-17Added parameters for specification to BIP0009.Eric Lombrozo
2015-10-02BIP 009: Minor revision to extend bit into lockin period.Rusty Russell
As discussed here: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011275.html Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2015-09-27More btcdrak feedback.Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2015-09-25Bip number assigned: 9.Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-05 19:11:49 +0000