summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bip-0001.mediawiki
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-01-01BIP1: clarify early stages of BIP championingBryan Bishop
The previous BIP1 text was ambiguous regarding early steps for taking an idea from concept and eventually into a BIP. The new text is intended to make it more clear that the initial email to the bitcoin-dev mailing list should not be a fully-formed BIP. There have been exceptions to this in the past for ideas already widely known and implementation in progress, but "you know it when you see it". Hopefully this will add clarity to the BIP authoring process and work flow for new authors.
2016-01-01BIP1: clarify "issue tracker" statementBryan Bishop
This switches from specifying "Bitcoin issue tracker" to specifying "Bitcoin Core issue tracker". Other issue trackers are useful for other client development activities, although this does not seem necessary to mention.
2016-01-01BIP1: trivial formatting changeBryan Bishop
2015-12-04BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" TypeAndy Chase
Previously BIP-0001 listed in its header preamble that is was a "Standards Track" type proposal. This conflicts with both its own definition of "Standards Track" proposal as well as the type listed in PEP-0001 of which BIP-0001 is based on. Defitions of each type of proposal: A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations. An Informational BIP describes a Bitcoin design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Bitcoin community, but does not propose a new feature. A Process BIP describes a process surrounding Bitcoin, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process. Specifically: "Any meta-BIP is also considered a Process BIP." Based on these definitions BIP-0001 should have always been labeled as a "Process" BIP and this patch corrects this.
2015-12-01Change BIP1 to status ActiveWladimir J. van der Laan
From the text: "Some Informational and Process BIPs may also have a status of "Active" if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. BIP 1 (this BIP)."
2015-10-21Added changelogBtcDrak
2015-10-21Simplify clarificationsBtcDrak
2015-06-29Update Missed Mailing List LinkAmos Bairn
A second link to the mailing list was missed and left pointing to the old list.
2015-06-22bip-0001: Mailing list moveWladimir J. van der Laan
2014-06-16Fixed typoReadLiberty
2014-04-05Change date format to ISO 8601Wladimir J. van der Laan
This came up on the mailing list. yyyy-mm-dd (ISO 8601) is the internationally accepted format for numeric dates. This commit changes all BIPs to use that instead of dd-mm-yyyy. It also updates BIP 0001 to prescribe the new format.
2013-12-06Update BIP-0001 for github moveWladimir J. van der Laan
- Mention github instead of wiki - Add markdown as allowed format - Fix some weirdnesses such as "A BIP editor must subscribe to the gmaxwell@gmail.com list.". Remove the repetition and create a new section which lists the BIP editors (currently only gmaxwell). - Prefer discussion on mailing list to forum
2013-10-21Fix formattingPeter Todd
2013-10-21Archive Revision as of 21:29, 6 October 2013Peter Todd
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=BIP_0001&oldid=41572
2013-10-21Rename to mediawiki extensionPeter Todd