Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2016-05-15 | Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330 | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-11 | bip-0009: Remove n/a paragraph | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-11 | Replace "rules/force" mutation with a "cannot be ignored" prefix to rule names | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-05-10 | Merge pull request #381 from dooglus/patch-3 | Luke-Jr | |
Update bip-0112.mediawiki | |||
2016-05-07 | Merge pull request #384 from jl2012/patch-19 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141: BIP9 parameters for testnet | |||
2016-05-06 | BIP141: BIP9 parameters for testnet | Johnson Lau | |
2016-05-01 | Merge pull request #378 from jl2012/patch-18 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141 clarifications and formatting | |||
2016-05-01 | Merge pull request #382 from dooglus/patch-4 | Luke-Jr | |
Update bip-0068.mediawiki | |||
2016-04-30 | Update bip-0068.mediawiki | Chris Moore | |
Fix typo. | |||
2016-04-30 | Update bip-0112.mediawiki | Chris Moore | |
CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is absolute (not relative) isn't it? | |||
2016-04-29 | Merge pull request #380 from achow101/master | Luke-Jr | |
Update BIP 144 'havewitness' to service bit | |||
2016-04-28 | Update to NODE_WITNESS service bit | Andrew Chow | |
2016-04-26 | BIP141 clarifications and formatting | Johnson Lau | |
Add rationale of block cost Change the name of "witness nonce" to "witness reserved value" Update link to reference implementation Formatting | |||
2016-04-26 | Merge pull request #377 from OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/bip47 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP-0047: version 2 payment codes | |||
2016-04-25 | Merge pull request #2 from justusranvier/bip47 | Kristov Atlas | |
BIP-47: version 2 payment codes | |||
2016-04-25 | BIP 9 & 145: rules/force mutation | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-23 | BIP 9: Clarify GBT "version" | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-23 | BIP 9, 22 & 145: Use simple Yes/No rather than templates (which don't work ↵ | Luke Dashjr | |
on GitHub) | |||
2016-04-23 | Merge remote-tracking branch 'personal-github/segwit_gbt_updates_20160330' ↵ | Luke Dashjr | |
into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330 | |||
2016-04-23 | BIP 9 (& 145): Switch to rules/vbavailable/vbrequired GBT interface | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-23 | bip-0009: Recommend name "bipN" | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-23 | Merge branch 'master' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330 | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-23 | Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2sh | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost | |||
2016-04-23 | BIP141: Block cost clrification | jl2012 | |
2016-04-23 | Add P2SH-P2WPKH example | jl2012 | |
2016-04-23 | Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4 | Luke-Jr | |
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation | |||
2016-04-22 | Update bip-0141.mediawiki | Aaron Voisine | |
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}" What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules. | |||
2016-04-20 | Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehash | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function | |||
2016-04-20 | Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofix | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143: fix typo ("including") | |||
2016-04-20 | Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE | |||
2016-04-20 | BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash function | Bryan Bishop | |
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more readily understand the context of the proposal. | |||
2016-04-21 | BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE | Johnson Lau | |
2016-04-20 | BIP143: fix typo ("including") | Bryan Bishop | |
2016-04-19 | add version 2 section for bloom filter-based notifications | Justus Ranvier | |
2016-04-19 | add recommended handling for notification tx change outputs | Justus Ranvier | |
2016-04-19 | explain the usage of versions with regards to payment code behavior | Justus Ranvier | |
2016-04-17 | Merge pull request #371 from justusranvier/bip47 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints | |||
2016-04-17 | BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints | Justus Ranvier | |
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source | |||
2016-04-14 | Merge pull request #369 from instagibbs/bip114clar | Luke-Jr | |
Some clarification on path meaning and structure | |||
2016-04-14 | Merge pull request #370 from jl2012/bip114ref | Luke-Jr | |
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation | |||
2016-04-14 | BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation | jl2012 | |
2016-04-13 | Some clarification on path meaning and structure | instagibbs | |
2016-04-12 | Merge BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-12 | Assign BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-08 | Merge pull request #367 from jl2012/bip141commitment | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram | |||
2016-04-09 | BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram | jl2012 | |
2016-04-05 | Merge pull request #1 from jl2012/patch-13 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141: Sigop clarification | |||
2016-04-05 | Update bip-0141.mediawiki | Johnson Lau | |
2016-04-02 | Create BIP MAST | jl2012 | |
2016-03-31 | Merge pull request #366 from btcdrak/patch-7 | Luke-Jr | |
Clarify what remains "to be decided" |