summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-05-22BIP 9: Use simple Yes/No rather than templates (which don't work on GitHub)Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Switch to rules/vbavailable/vbrequired GBT interfaceLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22bip-0009: Recommend name "bipN"Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: GBT specificationLuke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Add softfork deployment "name"Luke Dashjr
2016-05-22BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit orderLuke Dashjr
2016-05-19Merge pull request #385 from techguy613/masterLuke-Jr
BIP75 Simplification and Enhancements
2016-05-18Merge pull request #388 from stevenroose/patch-2Luke-Jr
Error in BIP0009 code example
2016-05-18Merge pull request #362 from jonasschnelli/2016/03/auth_encLuke-Jr
BIP 151: Peer-to-Peer Communication Encryption
2016-05-18Add BIP151, Peer-to-Peer Communication EncryptionJonas Schnelli
2016-05-17Less visible errorSteven Roose
2016-05-14Error in BIP0009 codeSteven Roose
2016-05-14BIP0009 code syntax fixSteven Roose
2016-05-11- Remove libsecp256k1 referenceMatt David
2016-05-11- Update ECDH output to use SHA512 instead of SHA256Matt David
- Specify HMAC_DRBG security strength
2016-05-10Merge pull request #381 from dooglus/patch-3Luke-Jr
Update bip-0112.mediawiki
2016-05-09Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'Matt David
# Conflicts: # bip-0075.mediawiki
2016-05-07Merge pull request #384 from jl2012/patch-19Luke-Jr
BIP141: BIP9 parameters for testnet
2016-05-06BIP141: BIP9 parameters for testnetJohnson Lau
2016-05-01Merge pull request #378 from jl2012/patch-18Luke-Jr
BIP141 clarifications and formatting
2016-05-01Merge pull request #382 from dooglus/patch-4Luke-Jr
Update bip-0068.mediawiki
2016-04-30Update bip-0068.mediawikiChris Moore
Fix typo.
2016-04-30Update bip-0112.mediawikiChris Moore
CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is absolute (not relative) isn't it?
2016-04-29Merge pull request #380 from achow101/masterLuke-Jr
Update BIP 144 'havewitness' to service bit
2016-04-28Merge pull request #17 from jmacwhyte/masterMatt David
Updated S&F suggestions, some other tweaks and typos.
2016-04-28Updated S&F suggestions, some other tweaks and typos.jmacwhyte
2016-04-28- SpacingMatt David
- Recommit mistakently deleted encrypted invoicerequest flow diagram
2016-04-28Update to NODE_WITNESS service bitAndrew Chow
2016-04-27Fix spacing again and pull IV size down to 12 bytes in accord with NIST 800-38DMatt David
2016-04-27- Fix spacingMatt David
2016-04-27- Fix spacingMatt David
2016-04-27- Add information about the use of GCM Authentication tagMatt David
- Add requirement of additional authenticated data in the case that either status_code and/or status_message are in use
2016-04-26Add more linebreaksMatt David
2016-04-26Adding linebreaks and fixing some bad linksMatt David
2016-04-26- Fix straggling EncryptedPaymentRequest referenceMatt David
2016-04-26- Fix formatting + fix/add linksMatt David
- Update images
2016-04-26- Reset bip-0070/extensions.mediawiki to the original BIP70 contentsMatt David
- Remove status_code and status_message from individual Payment Protocol messages - Remove EncryptedInvoiceRequest, EncryptedPaymentRequest, EncryptedPayment and EncryptedPaymentACK messages from protobuf definition file - Add ProtocolMessageType enum and ProtocolMessageType and EncryptedProtocolMesssage messages to bip-0075/paymentrequest.proto definition file - Update BIP75 text to remove old individual message encryption paths and include new encapsulating messages for self-contained PaymentProtocol communication (including errors) over various transport layers - Add initial list of status codes - Update BIP75 to use AES-256-GCM and remove message hash as GCM mode provides authenticated encryption - Update ECDH calculation to use SHA256 hash of ECDH's X point instead of the raw X point itself
2016-04-26BIP141 clarifications and formattingJohnson Lau
Add rationale of block cost Change the name of "witness nonce" to "witness reserved value" Update link to reference implementation Formatting
2016-04-26Merge pull request #377 from OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/bip47Luke-Jr
BIP-0047: version 2 payment codes
2016-04-25Merge pull request #2 from justusranvier/bip47Kristov Atlas
BIP-47: version 2 payment codes
2016-04-23Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2shLuke-Jr
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost
2016-04-23BIP141: Block cost clrificationjl2012
2016-04-23Add P2SH-P2WPKH examplejl2012
2016-04-23Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4Luke-Jr
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation
2016-04-22Update bip-0141.mediawikiAaron Voisine
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}" What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules.
2016-04-20Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehashLuke-Jr
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function
2016-04-20Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofixLuke-Jr
BIP143: fix typo ("including")
2016-04-20Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16Luke-Jr
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE
2016-04-20BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash functionBryan Bishop
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more readily understand the context of the proposal.
2016-04-21BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLEJohnson Lau
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-06 23:08:34 +0000