Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2016-04-26 | BIP141 clarifications and formatting | Johnson Lau | |
Add rationale of block cost Change the name of "witness nonce" to "witness reserved value" Update link to reference implementation Formatting | |||
2016-04-26 | Merge pull request #377 from OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/bip47 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP-0047: version 2 payment codes | |||
2016-04-25 | Merge pull request #2 from justusranvier/bip47 | Kristov Atlas | |
BIP-47: version 2 payment codes | |||
2016-04-23 | Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2sh | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost | |||
2016-04-23 | BIP141: Block cost clrification | jl2012 | |
2016-04-23 | Add P2SH-P2WPKH example | jl2012 | |
2016-04-23 | Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4 | Luke-Jr | |
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation | |||
2016-04-22 | Update bip-0141.mediawiki | Aaron Voisine | |
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}" What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules. | |||
2016-04-20 | Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehash | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function | |||
2016-04-20 | Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofix | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143: fix typo ("including") | |||
2016-04-20 | Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE | |||
2016-04-20 | BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash function | Bryan Bishop | |
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more readily understand the context of the proposal. | |||
2016-04-21 | BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE | Johnson Lau | |
2016-04-20 | BIP143: fix typo ("including") | Bryan Bishop | |
2016-04-19 | add version 2 section for bloom filter-based notifications | Justus Ranvier | |
2016-04-19 | add recommended handling for notification tx change outputs | Justus Ranvier | |
2016-04-19 | explain the usage of versions with regards to payment code behavior | Justus Ranvier | |
2016-04-17 | Merge pull request #371 from justusranvier/bip47 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints | |||
2016-04-17 | BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints | Justus Ranvier | |
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source | |||
2016-04-14 | Merge pull request #369 from instagibbs/bip114clar | Luke-Jr | |
Some clarification on path meaning and structure | |||
2016-04-14 | Merge pull request #370 from jl2012/bip114ref | Luke-Jr | |
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation | |||
2016-04-14 | BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation | jl2012 | |
2016-04-13 | Some clarification on path meaning and structure | instagibbs | |
2016-04-12 | Merge BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-12 | Assign BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-04-08 | Merge pull request #367 from jl2012/bip141commitment | Luke-Jr | |
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram | |||
2016-04-09 | BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram | jl2012 | |
2016-04-02 | Create BIP MAST | jl2012 | |
2016-03-31 | Merge pull request #366 from btcdrak/patch-7 | Luke-Jr | |
Clarify what remains "to be decided" | |||
2016-03-31 | Clarify what remains "to be decided" | ฿tcDrak | |
2016-03-28 | Merge pull request #364 from jl2012/patch-13 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP143: Provide private key used in the example | |||
2016-03-28 | Merge pull request #363 from CodeShark/bip141_edits | Luke-Jr | |
Witness validation logic trigger clarifications | |||
2016-03-28 | Merge pull request #360 from luke-jr/bip0002_deferred | Luke-Jr | |
Defer BIP 2 | |||
2016-03-29 | BIP143: Provide private key used in the example | Johnson Lau | |
2016-03-25 | Witness validation logic trigger clarifications | Eric Lombrozo | |
2016-03-21 | Merge pull request #361 from btcdrak/patch-5 | Luke-Jr | |
Remove deployment section | |||
2016-03-21 | Remove deployment section. | ฿tcDrak | |
Now we know we will use BIP9 version bits, remove references to ISM() and leave TDB as was done with BIP68,112 and 113. | |||
2016-03-18 | Defer BIP 2 | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-03-18 | Merge pull request #359 from btcdrak/cvsdeploy | Luke-Jr | |
Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113 | |||
2016-03-17 | Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113 | BtcDrak | |
2016-03-17 | Merge BIP 75 | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-03-17 | Put BIP 75 in the right place in README, and clean up formatting a bit | Luke Dashjr | |
2016-03-16 | Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' | Matt David | |
2016-03-16 | Update BIP header to pass TravisCI | Matt David | |
2016-03-16 | Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' | Matt David | |
2016-03-16 | Merge pull request #16 from jmacwhyte/proofread | Matt David | |
Removed BIP70 extensions | |||
2016-03-16 | Merge pull request #355 from jl2012/patch-12 | Luke-Jr | |
BIP142: Deferred | |||
2016-03-17 | BIP142: Deferred | Johnson Lau | |
2016-03-16 | BIP142: Deferred | Johnson Lau | |
BIP142 will not be deployed with BIP141 at the same time. Initially, people are expected to use P2SH segwit, or payment protocol for native segwit | |||
2016-03-15 | Removed BIP70 extensions | jmacwhyte | |