| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Set bit 10 and 11 for NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED_LOW, HIGH
|
|
|
|
BIP 159: NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED service bits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update BIP173: new reference impls + tests fix
|
|
Add an implementation of Swift
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fixed small typo [in BIP 30]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update BIP91 reference implementation repository
|
|
|
|
Fix typo
|
|
|
|
Amend BIP8 by height
|
|
|
|
Clarify when BIP91 will cease to be active
|
|
|
|
Use a smaller deployment period for BIP91 but don't enforce until active.
|
|
|
|
Update BIP91 confirmation window and enforcement.
|
|
|
|
BIP 154 cleanup: remove TODO entry
|
|
|
|
small typo in bip47
|
|
BIP 154: Rate Limiting via peer specified challenges
|
|
|
|
Fix BIP91 typo
|
|
|
|
BIP 91: Reduced threshold Segwit MASF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add link to implementation on Bitcoin Core (PR#10437)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
readme: Clarify status for formally accepted BIPs
|
|
In the table there are some BIPs with a status of Active, and others
with a status of Final. Just wanted to submit this slight text change
for review to the README to indicate that both mean a BIP is formally
accepted.
|
|
lock-time in Rationale
|
|
BIP 115: Generic anti-replay protection using Script
|
