summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-10-05added backwards compatibility and copyrightDaniel Weigl
2016-09-07Merge pull request #1 from afk11/weigl-deriv-bipDanielWeigl
Fix url for BIP44
2016-09-07Fix url for BIP44Thomas Kerin
2016-06-14minor cleanupsDaniel Weigl
2016-06-14new bip proposal "Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts"Daniel Weigl
2016-05-01Merge pull request #378 from jl2012/patch-18Luke-Jr
BIP141 clarifications and formatting
2016-05-01Merge pull request #382 from dooglus/patch-4Luke-Jr
Update bip-0068.mediawiki
2016-04-30Update bip-0068.mediawikiChris Moore
Fix typo.
2016-04-29Merge pull request #380 from achow101/masterLuke-Jr
Update BIP 144 'havewitness' to service bit
2016-04-28Update to NODE_WITNESS service bitAndrew Chow
2016-04-26BIP141 clarifications and formattingJohnson Lau
Add rationale of block cost Change the name of "witness nonce" to "witness reserved value" Update link to reference implementation Formatting
2016-04-26Merge pull request #377 from OpenBitcoinPrivacyProject/bip47Luke-Jr
BIP-0047: version 2 payment codes
2016-04-25Merge pull request #2 from justusranvier/bip47Kristov Atlas
BIP-47: version 2 payment codes
2016-04-23Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2shLuke-Jr
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost
2016-04-23BIP141: Block cost clrificationjl2012
2016-04-23Add P2SH-P2WPKH examplejl2012
2016-04-23Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4Luke-Jr
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation
2016-04-22Update bip-0141.mediawikiAaron Voisine
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}" What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules.
2016-04-20Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehashLuke-Jr
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function
2016-04-20Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofixLuke-Jr
BIP143: fix typo ("including")
2016-04-20Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16Luke-Jr
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE
2016-04-20BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash functionBryan Bishop
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more readily understand the context of the proposal.
2016-04-21BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLEJohnson Lau
2016-04-20BIP143: fix typo ("including")Bryan Bishop
2016-04-19add version 2 section for bloom filter-based notificationsJustus Ranvier
2016-04-19add recommended handling for notification tx change outputsJustus Ranvier
2016-04-19explain the usage of versions with regards to payment code behaviorJustus Ranvier
2016-04-17Merge pull request #371 from justusranvier/bip47Luke-Jr
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints
2016-04-17BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpointsJustus Ranvier
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source
2016-04-14Merge pull request #369 from instagibbs/bip114clarLuke-Jr
Some clarification on path meaning and structure
2016-04-14Merge pull request #370 from jl2012/bip114refLuke-Jr
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation
2016-04-14BIP114: Clarifying reference implementationjl2012
2016-04-13Some clarification on path meaning and structureinstagibbs
2016-04-12Merge BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax TreeLuke Dashjr
2016-04-12Assign BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax TreeLuke Dashjr
2016-04-08Merge pull request #367 from jl2012/bip141commitmentLuke-Jr
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram
2016-04-09BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagramjl2012
2016-04-02Create BIP MASTjl2012
2016-03-31Merge pull request #366 from btcdrak/patch-7Luke-Jr
Clarify what remains "to be decided"
2016-03-31Clarify what remains "to be decided"฿tcDrak
2016-03-28Merge pull request #364 from jl2012/patch-13Luke-Jr
BIP143: Provide private key used in the example
2016-03-28Merge pull request #363 from CodeShark/bip141_editsLuke-Jr
Witness validation logic trigger clarifications
2016-03-28Merge pull request #360 from luke-jr/bip0002_deferredLuke-Jr
Defer BIP 2
2016-03-29BIP143: Provide private key used in the exampleJohnson Lau
2016-03-25Witness validation logic trigger clarificationsEric Lombrozo
2016-03-21Merge pull request #361 from btcdrak/patch-5Luke-Jr
Remove deployment section
2016-03-21Remove deployment section.฿tcDrak
Now we know we will use BIP9 version bits, remove references to ISM() and leave TDB as was done with BIP68,112 and 113.
2016-03-18Defer BIP 2Luke Dashjr
2016-03-18Merge pull request #359 from btcdrak/cvsdeployLuke-Jr
Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113
2016-03-17Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113BtcDrak
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-06 11:10:11 +0000