summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-04-23Merge branch 'master' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330Luke Dashjr
2016-04-23Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2shLuke-Jr
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost
2016-04-23BIP141: Block cost clrificationjl2012
2016-04-23Add P2SH-P2WPKH examplejl2012
2016-04-23Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4Luke-Jr
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation
2016-04-22Update bip-0141.mediawikiAaron Voisine
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}" What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules.
2016-04-20Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehashLuke-Jr
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function
2016-04-20Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofixLuke-Jr
BIP143: fix typo ("including")
2016-04-20Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16Luke-Jr
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE
2016-04-20BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash functionBryan Bishop
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more readily understand the context of the proposal.
2016-04-21BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLEJohnson Lau
2016-04-20BIP143: fix typo ("including")Bryan Bishop
2016-04-19add version 2 section for bloom filter-based notificationsJustus Ranvier
2016-04-19add recommended handling for notification tx change outputsJustus Ranvier
2016-04-19explain the usage of versions with regards to payment code behaviorJustus Ranvier
2016-04-17Merge pull request #371 from justusranvier/bip47Luke-Jr
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints
2016-04-17BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpointsJustus Ranvier
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source
2016-04-14Merge pull request #369 from instagibbs/bip114clarLuke-Jr
Some clarification on path meaning and structure
2016-04-14Merge pull request #370 from jl2012/bip114refLuke-Jr
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation
2016-04-14BIP114: Clarifying reference implementationjl2012
2016-04-13Some clarification on path meaning and structureinstagibbs
2016-04-12Merge BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax TreeLuke Dashjr
2016-04-12Assign BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax TreeLuke Dashjr
2016-04-08Merge pull request #367 from jl2012/bip141commitmentLuke-Jr
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram
2016-04-09BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagramjl2012
2016-04-05Merge pull request #1 from jl2012/patch-13Luke-Jr
BIP141: Sigop clarification
2016-04-05Update bip-0141.mediawikiJohnson Lau
2016-04-02Create BIP MASTjl2012
2016-03-31Merge pull request #366 from btcdrak/patch-7Luke-Jr
Clarify what remains "to be decided"
2016-03-31Clarify what remains "to be decided"฿tcDrak
2016-03-31BIP141: Sigop clarificationJohnson Lau
2016-03-30BIP 141: Specify VB nameLuke Dashjr
2016-03-30BIP 145: Update for BIP 9Luke Dashjr
2016-03-30BIP 9: GBT specificationLuke Dashjr
2016-03-30BIP 9: Add softfork deployment "name"Luke Dashjr
2016-03-30BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit orderLuke Dashjr
2016-03-30BIP 141 & 145: Clarify sigop interactionLuke Dashjr
2016-03-29- Update HTTPS to be TLS-protected HTTPMatt David
- Add Updated Messages section to describe the status_code and status_message - Separated Message and Communication Errors into Payment Protocol Errors and Communication Errors - Add first draft Payment Protocol error codes - Update InvoiceRequest Message Creation description amount example to return Payment Protocol error in the case of an issue with the amount.
2016-03-28Merge pull request #364 from jl2012/patch-13Luke-Jr
BIP143: Provide private key used in the example
2016-03-28Merge pull request #363 from CodeShark/bip141_editsLuke-Jr
Witness validation logic trigger clarifications
2016-03-28Merge pull request #360 from luke-jr/bip0002_deferredLuke-Jr
Defer BIP 2
2016-03-29BIP143: Provide private key used in the exampleJohnson Lau
2016-03-25Witness validation logic trigger clarificationsEric Lombrozo
2016-03-21Merge pull request #361 from btcdrak/patch-5Luke-Jr
Remove deployment section
2016-03-21Remove deployment section.฿tcDrak
Now we know we will use BIP9 version bits, remove references to ISM() and leave TDB as was done with BIP68,112 and 113.
2016-03-18Defer BIP 2Luke Dashjr
2016-03-18Merge pull request #359 from btcdrak/cvsdeployLuke-Jr
Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113
2016-03-17Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113BtcDrak
2016-03-17Merge BIP 75Luke Dashjr
2016-03-17Put BIP 75 in the right place in README, and clean up formatting a bitLuke Dashjr
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-08-29 11:28:47 +0000