summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-11-13Minor: fix wordingPeter Todd
2015-11-13Merge pull request #237 from jtimon/bip99-2Luke-Jr
Bip99: Improvements
2015-11-13Merge pull request #240 from 6londe/patch-3Luke-Jr
typo fixed
2015-11-13typo fixedChanghoon Lee
trivial typo fixed
2015-11-10fixup! correctionsJorge Timón
2015-11-09adding Pieter Wuille's 'Block size following technological growthJonathan Wilkins
2015-11-09squashed versionJonathan Wilkins
2015-11-08Add bip99 to readmeJorge Timón
2015-11-08Improvements to Schism hardforks sectionJorge Timón
2015-11-08More corrections and improvementsJorge Timón
2015-11-07[trivial] typoMarcoFalke
2015-11-07Bip-99/Add details to definitionsAndy Chase
2015-11-07Random grammar and spelling stuffinstagibbs
2015-11-07Merge pull request #221 from sdaftuar/add-sendheadersLuke-Jr
New BIP for "sendheaders" p2p message
2015-11-07Merge pull request #181 from jtimon/bip-forksLuke-Jr
BIP99: Motivation and deployment of consensus rule changes
2015-11-07Merge pull request #236 from jgarzik/2015_2mb_blocksizeLuke-Jr
BIP 102: Add miner vote. Fix index.
2015-11-06BIP 102: Add miner vote. Fix index.Jeff Garzik
2015-11-05Some of kanzure's nits, copyright, updated Attribution, don't repeat ↵Jorge Timón
"Without entering in much detail"
2015-11-03Merge pull request #234 from btcdrak/patch-4Luke-Jr
Add clarification about upper bounds.
2015-11-03Add clarification about upper bounds.฿tcDrak
2015-10-27Merge pull request #229 from petertodd/bip65-spv-clientsLuke-Jr
BIP65 spv clients
2015-10-27Merge pull request #228 from btcdrak/bip65deploybitsLuke-Jr
Add note about not consuming nVersion bits
2015-10-27Merge pull request #231 from kallerosenbaum/bip121-fixesLuke-Jr
Bip121 fixes
2015-10-27Clarified that the PoP is sent as binary over httpKalle Rosenbaum
2015-10-27Removed mapping of merchant_data to btcpop-label since merchant data is a ↵Kalle Rosenbaum
byte-array, Thanks Andreas Schildbach. Instead map the memo field to btcpop-label and don't have any bip70 field mapped to btcpop-message.
2015-10-23BIP65: Add SPV client considerationsPeter Todd
2015-10-23BIP65: Fix deployment rulesPeter Todd
Previous version was incorrect and did not match how the actual IsSuperMajority() mechanism works.
2015-10-23Add BIP-130 to READMESuhas Daftuar
2015-10-23Update with assigned BIP number (130)Suhas Daftuar
2015-10-23Add section on additional constraintsSuhas Daftuar
2015-10-23New BIP for "sendheaders" p2p messageSuhas Daftuar
2015-10-23Add note about not consuming nVersion bitsBtcDrak
2015-10-23Merge pull request #227 from btcdrak/bip65deployLuke-Jr
Update deployment for BIP65
2015-10-23Update deployment for BIP65BtcDrak
2015-10-23Merge pull request #192 from CodeShark/BIP_ClassificationLuke-Jr
Bip classification
2015-10-23Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin-pull/173/head'Luke Dashjr
2015-10-23Merge pull request #200 from kallerosenbaum/masterLuke-Jr
Fixed unencoded space character in example
2015-10-22Added BIP123 to indexEric Lombrozo
2015-10-22Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'Kalle Rosenbaum
2015-10-21Added BIP mediawikiEric Lombrozo
2015-10-21Merge pull request #226 from jonathancross/patch-2Luke-Jr
Spelling fix and small clarification for BIP 120
2015-10-21Added changelogBtcDrak
2015-10-21Simplify clarificationsBtcDrak
2015-10-20Spelling fix and small clarification for BIP 120Jonathan Cross
Spelling: Line 42: "neccesarily" => "necessarily" Line 126: "scipts" => "scripts" One small improvement for clarity: Line 138: "another" => "a different"
2015-10-20Merge pull request #225 from jonathancross/patch-1Wladimir J. van der Laan
Spelling fix.
2015-10-20Spelling fix.Jonathan Cross
"unneccesarily" => "unnecessarily"
2015-10-16Merge pull request #220 from justusranvier/shared_secretLuke-Jr
Improve ECDH and blinding factor calculations
2015-10-12Improve ECDH and blinding factor calculationsJustus Ranvier
The blinding factor used for notification transactions incorporates and outpoint being spent by the notification transaction. This ensures that blinding factors will always be unique, even if a user sends a notification transaction to the same recipient multiple times while spending funds from the same address. Since some common EC libraries have ECDH functions that only return the x value of the resulting point, only use the x value for calculating scalar shared secrets.
2015-10-09Merge pull request #217 from zdexter/masterLuke-Jr
Fix ambiguous reference to seed value in BIP32 test vectors
2015-10-09Fix ambiguous reference to seed value in BIP32 test vectorsZach Dexter