summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bip-0065.mediawiki
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'bip-0065.mediawiki')
-rw-r--r--bip-0065.mediawiki4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/bip-0065.mediawiki b/bip-0065.mediawiki
index 904dc16..097751c 100644
--- a/bip-0065.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-0065.mediawiki
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ There exist a number of protocols where a transaction output is created that
requires the co-operation of both parties to spend the output. To ensure the
failure of one party does not result in the funds becoming lost, refund
transactions are setup in advance using nLockTime. These refund transactions
-need to be created interactively, and additionaly, are currently vulnerable to
+need to be created interactively, and additionally, are currently vulnerable to
transaction malleability. CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY can be used in these protocols,
replacing the interactive setup with a non-interactive setup, and additionally,
making transaction malleability a non-issue.
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ transaction is created, tx3, to ensure that should the payee vanish the payor
can get their deposit back. The process by which the refund transaction is
created is currently vulnerable to transaction malleability attacks, and
additionally, requires the payor to store the refund. Using the same
-scriptPubKey from as in the Two-factor wallets example solves both these issues.
+scriptPubKey form as in the Two-factor wallets example solves both these issues.
===Trustless Payments for Publishing Data===