From 2a619eadbe510c49e3b6a29d0813168840da998c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Grothoff Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:37 +0200 Subject: fix more typos --- contrib/articles/ui/ui-cameraready.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'contrib/articles/ui/ui-cameraready.tex') diff --git a/contrib/articles/ui/ui-cameraready.tex b/contrib/articles/ui/ui-cameraready.tex index 59a834212..ef79d91ba 100644 --- a/contrib/articles/ui/ui-cameraready.tex +++ b/contrib/articles/ui/ui-cameraready.tex @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ it has the following key advantages: % // ... % let refundPermissions = /* ... */; % taler.acceptRefunds(refundPermissions, (err) => { -% alert("An error occured while attempting a refund"); +% alert("An error occurred while attempting a refund"); % }); % %\end{lstlisting} @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ anonymous payment system. %a refund operation cannot be considered anonymous anymore because a %merchant, and possibly the exchange, has now seen them and could %link them that previous transaction. At best, these tainted coins -%are only pseudononymous, similar to Bitcoin accounts. +%are only pseudonymous, similar to Bitcoin accounts. % %To maintain anonymity, a Taler wallet automatically performs a %{\em refresh} operation with the mint API to both replace tainted @@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ situation. Finally, attempts to address the scalability hudles of Bitcoin using side-chains or schemes like BOLT introduce semi-centralized -intermediaries, not wholey unlike Taler's use of exchanges. Compared +intermediaries, not wholly unlike Taler's use of exchanges. Compared to BOLT, we would expect a Taler exchange operating in BTC to offer stronger security to all parties and stronger anonymity to customers, as well as being vastly cheaper to operate. -- cgit v1.2.3