From 0e808b648a56e3e4e17d6e03ce776b0b7a422f25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Grothoff Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:56:52 +0200 Subject: fix misc typos --- doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt') diff --git a/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt b/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt index 80e590c38..176e9c750 100644 --- a/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt +++ b/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ is less a currency and more an open protocol for creating new currencies. So what? And why do altcoins become a ponzi scheme? (Noting that you do not say that they might become one, rather that they do). -> We have adjusted that langauge, as some like Dogecoin have removed +> We have adjusted that language, as some like Dogecoin have removed > the 21 billion BTC cap to reduce the ponzi-like tendencies. > There remains a large trend towards ponzi schemes in the altcoin > world however, amusingly noted by https://ponzico.win/ and @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ scheme suggests that a any transfers of value should be taxed. However, the issuing protocol in 4.1 can be abused to transfer a coin, without paying tax, and in an unlikable manner. -> Technically 4.1 is not transfering a coin, as it is issuing a coin. +> Technically 4.1 is not transferring a coin, as it is issuing a coin. > Again, the loophole is/was discussed in the paper. The party withdrawing the coin -- cgit v1.2.3