From e361a772ffcd33675ffdd4637eea98a460dfed1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Huth Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:51:23 +0100 Subject: Don't talk about the LGPL if the file is licensed under the GPL Some files claim that the code is licensed under the GPL, but then suddenly suggest that the user should have a look at the LGPL. That's of course non-sense, replace it with the correct GPL wording instead. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Message-Id: <1548255083-8190-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier --- target/i386/hvf/hvf.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'target/i386/hvf') diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c index e193022c03..689b585027 100644 --- a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU - * Lesser General Public License for more details. + * General Public License for more details. * - * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public - * License along with this program; if not, see . + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + * along with this program; if not, see . * * This file contain code under public domain from the hvdos project: * https://github.com/mist64/hvdos -- cgit v1.2.3