From e474e3aacf4276eb0781d11c45e2fab996f9dc56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:18:32 +0100 Subject: seccomp: fix killing of whole process instead of thread MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Back in 2018 we introduced support for killing the whole QEMU process instead of just one thread, when a seccomp rule is violated: commit bda08a5764d470f101fa38635d30b41179a313e1 Author: Marc-André Lureau Date: Wed Aug 22 19:02:48 2018 +0200 seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available Fast forward a year and we introduced a patch to avoid killing the process for resource control syscalls tickled by Mesa. commit 9a1565a03b79d80b236bc7cc2dbce52a2ef3a1b8 Author: Daniel P. Berrangé Date: Wed Mar 13 09:49:03 2019 +0000 seccomp: don't kill process for resource control syscalls Unfortunately a logic bug effectively reverted the first commit mentioned so that we go back to only killing the thread, not the whole process. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo --- qemu-seccomp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'qemu-seccomp.c') diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c index e0a1829b3d..8325ecb766 100644 --- a/qemu-seccomp.c +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c @@ -136,8 +136,9 @@ static uint32_t qemu_seccomp_get_action(int set) if (qemu_seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL, 0, &action) == 0) { kill_process = 1; + } else { + kill_process = 0; } - kill_process = 0; } if (kill_process == 1) { return SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS; -- cgit v1.2.3