From 9e59899f8c75e3a7b327eb42ef61818d7f06992e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:00:35 +0100 Subject: linux-user: Don't assume 0 is not a valid host timer_t value For handling guest POSIX timers, we currently use an array g_posix_timers[], whose entries are a host timer_t value, or 0 for "this slot is unused". When the guest calls the timer_create syscall we look through the array for a slot containing 0, and use that for the new timer. This scheme assumes that host timer_t values can never be zero. This is unfortunately not a valid assumption -- for some host libc versions, timer_t values are simply indexes starting at 0. When using this kind of host libc, the effect is that the first and second timers end up sharing a slot, and so when the guest tries to operate on the first timer it changes the second timer instead. Rework the timer allocation code, so that: * the 'slot in use' indication uses a separate array from the host timer_t array * we grab the free slot atomically, to avoid races when multiple threads call timer_create simultaneously * releasing an allocated slot is abstracted out into a new free_host_timer_slot() function called in the correct places This fixes: * problems on hosts where timer_t 0 is valid * the FIXME in next_free_host_timer() about locking * bugs in the error paths in timer_create where we forgot to release the slot we grabbed, or forgot to free the host timer Reported-by: Jon Alduan Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Message-Id: <20220725110035.1273441-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier --- linux-user/syscall.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'linux-user') diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c index 54b29f3b40..e0e0f05812 100644 --- a/linux-user/syscall.c +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c @@ -525,20 +525,25 @@ _syscall4(int, sys_prlimit64, pid_t, pid, int, resource, #if defined(TARGET_NR_timer_create) /* Maximum of 32 active POSIX timers allowed at any one time. */ -static timer_t g_posix_timers[32] = { 0, } ; +#define GUEST_TIMER_MAX 32 +static timer_t g_posix_timers[GUEST_TIMER_MAX]; +static int g_posix_timer_allocated[GUEST_TIMER_MAX]; static inline int next_free_host_timer(void) { - int k ; - /* FIXME: Does finding the next free slot require a lock? */ - for (k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(g_posix_timers); k++) { - if (g_posix_timers[k] == 0) { - g_posix_timers[k] = (timer_t) 1; + int k; + for (k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(g_posix_timer_allocated); k++) { + if (qatomic_xchg(g_posix_timer_allocated + k, 1) == 0) { return k; } } return -1; } + +static inline void free_host_timer_slot(int id) +{ + qatomic_store_release(g_posix_timer_allocated + id, 0); +} #endif static inline int host_to_target_errno(int host_errno) @@ -12896,15 +12901,18 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1, phost_sevp = &host_sevp; ret = target_to_host_sigevent(phost_sevp, arg2); if (ret != 0) { + free_host_timer_slot(timer_index); return ret; } } ret = get_errno(timer_create(clkid, phost_sevp, phtimer)); if (ret) { - phtimer = NULL; + free_host_timer_slot(timer_index); } else { if (put_user(TIMER_MAGIC | timer_index, arg3, target_timer_t)) { + timer_delete(*phtimer); + free_host_timer_slot(timer_index); return -TARGET_EFAULT; } } @@ -13040,7 +13048,7 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1, } else { timer_t htimer = g_posix_timers[timerid]; ret = get_errno(timer_delete(htimer)); - g_posix_timers[timerid] = 0; + free_host_timer_slot(timerid); } return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3