From 25ac5bbec43973e9b97a454e55fd307ef9db1320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:58:42 +0000
Subject: CODING_STYLE: Mention preferred comment form

Our defacto coding style strongly prefers /* */ style comments
over the single-line // style, and checkpatch enforces this,
but we don't actually document this. Mention it in CODING_STYLE.

Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
---
 CODING_STYLE | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index f53180bf3f..2fa0c0b65b 100644
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -116,3 +116,10 @@ if (a == 1) {
 Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
 Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
 even when the constant is on the right.
+
+7. Comment style
+
+We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
+
+Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
+consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3