From 0546b8c2f089867cd7606ff47e026e8931157828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Weil Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:03:25 +0200 Subject: Spelling fixes in comments and documentation These wrong spellings were detected by codespell: * successully -> successfully * alot -> a lot * wanna -> want to * infomation -> information * occured -> occurred ["also is" -> "is also" and "ressources" -> "resources" suggested by Peter Maydell ] Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- docs/specs/ppc-spapr-hcalls.txt | 2 +- docs/usb2.txt | 4 ++-- hw/xen_pt.h | 4 ++-- hw/xen_pt_config_init.c | 14 +++++++------- qemu-img.c | 2 +- qemu-img.texi | 2 +- 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/specs/ppc-spapr-hcalls.txt b/docs/specs/ppc-spapr-hcalls.txt index 52ba8d42ab..667b3fa00e 100644 --- a/docs/specs/ppc-spapr-hcalls.txt +++ b/docs/specs/ppc-spapr-hcalls.txt @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Arguments: Returns: - H_SUCCESS : Successully called the RTAS function (RTAS result + H_SUCCESS : Successfully called the RTAS function (RTAS result will have been stored in the parameter block) H_PARAMETER : Unknown token diff --git a/docs/usb2.txt b/docs/usb2.txt index d17e3c0044..43dacdec28 100644 --- a/docs/usb2.txt +++ b/docs/usb2.txt @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ try ... xhci controller support ----------------------- -There also is xhci host controller support available. It got alot +There is also xhci host controller support available. It got a lot less testing than ehci and there are a bunch of known limitations, so ehci may work better for you. On the other hand the xhci hardware design is much more virtualization-friendly, thus xhci emulation uses -less ressources (especially cpu). If you wanna give xhci a try +less resources (especially cpu). If you want to give xhci a try use this to add the host controller ... qemu -device nec-usb-xhci,id=xhci diff --git a/hw/xen_pt.h b/hw/xen_pt.h index 41904ece93..112477a881 100644 --- a/hw/xen_pt.h +++ b/hw/xen_pt.h @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ typedef struct XenPTRegion { * - do NOT use ALL F for init_val, otherwise the tbl will not be registered. */ -/* emulated register infomation */ +/* emulated register information */ struct XenPTRegInfo { uint32_t offset; uint32_t size; @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ typedef int (*xen_pt_reg_size_init_fn) (XenPCIPassthroughState *, const XenPTRegGroupInfo *, uint32_t base_offset, uint8_t *size); -/* emulated register group infomation */ +/* emulated register group information */ struct XenPTRegGroupInfo { uint8_t grp_id; XenPTRegisterGroupType grp_type; diff --git a/hw/xen_pt_config_init.c b/hw/xen_pt_config_init.c index 00eb3d997d..e524a4094d 100644 --- a/hw/xen_pt_config_init.c +++ b/hw/xen_pt_config_init.c @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int xen_pt_exp_rom_bar_reg_write(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, return 0; } -/* Header Type0 reg static infomation table */ +/* Header Type0 reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_header0[] = { /* Vendor ID reg */ { @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_header0[] = { * Vital Product Data Capability */ -/* Vital Product Data Capability Structure reg static infomation table */ +/* Vital Product Data Capability Structure reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_vpd[] = { { .offset = PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_vpd[] = { * Vendor Specific Capability */ -/* Vendor Specific Capability Structure reg static infomation table */ +/* Vendor Specific Capability Structure reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_vendor[] = { { .offset = PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static int xen_pt_linkctrl2_reg_init(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, return 0; } -/* PCI Express Capability Structure reg static infomation table */ +/* PCI Express Capability Structure reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_pcie[] = { /* Next Pointer reg */ { @@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int xen_pt_pmcsr_reg_write(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, return 0; } -/* Power Management Capability reg static infomation table */ +/* Power Management Capability reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_pm[] = { /* Next Pointer reg */ { @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ static int xen_pt_msgdata_reg_write(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, return 0; } -/* MSI Capability Structure reg static infomation table */ +/* MSI Capability Structure reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_msi[] = { /* Next Pointer reg */ { @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static int xen_pt_msixctrl_reg_write(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, return 0; } -/* MSI-X Capability Structure reg static infomation table */ +/* MSI-X Capability Structure reg static information table */ static XenPTRegInfo xen_pt_emu_reg_msix[] = { /* Next Pointer reg */ { diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c index b41e670a61..833b2b0180 100644 --- a/qemu-img.c +++ b/qemu-img.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void help(void) " '-r' tries to repair any inconsistencies that are found during the check.\n" " '-r leaks' repairs only cluster leaks, whereas '-r all' fixes all\n" " kinds of errors, with a higher risk of choosing the wrong fix or\n" - " hiding corruption that has already occured.\n" + " hiding corruption that has already occurred.\n" "\n" "Parameters to snapshot subcommand:\n" " 'snapshot' is the name of the snapshot to create, apply or delete\n" diff --git a/qemu-img.texi b/qemu-img.texi index 6b42e35fe7..360543b807 100644 --- a/qemu-img.texi +++ b/qemu-img.texi @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Perform a consistency check on the disk image @var{filename}. If @code{-r} is specified, qemu-img tries to repair any inconsistencies found during the check. @code{-r leaks} repairs only cluster leaks, whereas @code{-r all} fixes all kinds of errors, with a higher risk of choosing the -wrong fix or hiding corruption that has already occured. +wrong fix or hiding corruption that has already occurred. Only the formats @code{qcow2}, @code{qed} and @code{vdi} support consistency checks. -- cgit v1.2.3