| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Reporting "Failed to connect socket" is essentially useless for a user
attempting to diagnose failure. It needs to include the target address
details. Similarly when failing to create a socket we should include the
socket family info, so the user understands what particular feature was
missing in their kernel build (IPv6, VSock in particular).
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
|
|
Linux 5.3 has made 0.0.0.0/8 a working IPv4 subnet. As such, "42" is
now a valid host, and the connection to it will (hopefully) time out
over a long period rather than quickly return with EINVAL.
So let us use a negative integer for testing that NBD will not crash
when it receives integer hosts. This way, the connection will again
fail quickly and reliably.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191002174052.5773-1-mreitz@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
There are some (mostly ISP-specific) name servers who will redirect
non-existing domains to special hosts. In this case, we will get a
different error message when trying to connect to such a host, which
breaks test 162.
162 needed this specific error message so it can confirm that qemu was
indeed trying to connect to the user-specified port. However, we can
also confirm this by setting up a local NBD server on exactly that port;
so we can fix the issue by doing just that.
Reported-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
