aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>2021-04-28 18:17:31 +0300
committerKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>2021-04-30 12:27:47 +0200
commit397f7cc0c217cfe45f42ee21e2ad5b84f3333b67 (patch)
treec5ab18e8d0eff94a46db4e90107658c25d9fe79e /tests
parente6af4f0e9414d36c0f0baddfb274003c0e7d6ecb (diff)
tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod: add test_append_greedy_filter
bdrv_append() is not quite good for inserting filters: it does extra permission update in intermediate state, where filter get it filtered child but is not yet replace it in a backing chain. Some filters (for example backup-top) may want permissions even when have no parents. And described intermediate state becomes invalid. That's (half a) reason, why we need "inactive" state for backup-top filter. bdrv_append() will be improved later, now let's add a unit test. Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do ./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/append-greedy-filter from <build-directory>/tests. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r--tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c33
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
index a8219b131e..5b6934e68b 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
@@ -352,6 +352,37 @@ static void test_parallel_perm_update(void)
bdrv_unref(top);
}
+/*
+ * It's possible that filter required permissions allows to insert it to backing
+ * chain, like:
+ *
+ * 1. [top] -> [filter] -> [base]
+ *
+ * but doesn't allow to add it as a branch:
+ *
+ * 2. [filter] --\
+ * v
+ * [top] -> [base]
+ *
+ * So, inserting such filter should do all graph modifications and only then
+ * update permissions. If we try to go through intermediate state [2] and update
+ * permissions on it we'll fail.
+ *
+ * Let's check that bdrv_append() can append such a filter.
+ */
+static void test_append_greedy_filter(void)
+{
+ BlockDriverState *top = exclusive_writer_node("top");
+ BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base");
+ BlockDriverState *fl = exclusive_writer_node("fl1");
+
+ bdrv_attach_child(top, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_COW,
+ &error_abort);
+
+ bdrv_append(fl, base, &error_abort);
+ bdrv_unref(top);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i;
@@ -378,6 +409,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
test_parallel_exclusive_write);
g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-perm-update",
test_parallel_perm_update);
+ g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/append-greedy-filter",
+ test_append_greedy_filter);
}
return g_test_run();