diff options
author | Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> | 2014-03-03 11:30:03 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> | 2014-03-13 14:42:21 +0100 |
commit | 2da61b671eb89fcaa306738f44eed472977d6587 (patch) | |
tree | 61673e48ab889a6ea113ff4d2be2d48d7108d1a1 /tests/test-rfifolock.c | |
parent | 11f590b1a242492a0108da42f40f0e2b20f0a778 (diff) |
rfifolock: add recursive FIFO lock
QemuMutex does not guarantee fairness and cannot be acquired
recursively:
Fairness means each locker gets a turn and the scheduler cannot cause
starvation.
Recursive locking is useful for composition, it allows a sequence of
locking operations to be invoked atomically by acquiring the lock around
them.
This patch adds RFifoLock, a recursive lock that guarantees FIFO order.
Its first user is added in the next patch.
RFifoLock has one additional feature: it can be initialized with an
optional contention callback. The callback is invoked whenever a thread
must wait for the lock. For example, it can be used to poke the current
owner so that they release the lock soon.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/test-rfifolock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/test-rfifolock.c | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test-rfifolock.c b/tests/test-rfifolock.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0572ebb42a --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/test-rfifolock.c @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +/* + * RFifoLock tests + * + * Copyright Red Hat, Inc. 2013 + * + * Authors: + * Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> + * + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2 or later. + * See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory. + */ + +#include <glib.h> +#include "qemu-common.h" +#include "qemu/rfifolock.h" + +static void test_nesting(void) +{ + RFifoLock lock; + + /* Trivial test, ensure the lock is recursive */ + rfifolock_init(&lock, NULL, NULL); + rfifolock_lock(&lock); + rfifolock_lock(&lock); + rfifolock_lock(&lock); + rfifolock_unlock(&lock); + rfifolock_unlock(&lock); + rfifolock_unlock(&lock); + rfifolock_destroy(&lock); +} + +typedef struct { + RFifoLock lock; + int fd[2]; +} CallbackTestData; + +static void rfifolock_cb(void *opaque) +{ + CallbackTestData *data = opaque; + int ret; + char c = 0; + + ret = write(data->fd[1], &c, sizeof(c)); + g_assert(ret == 1); +} + +static void *callback_thread(void *opaque) +{ + CallbackTestData *data = opaque; + + /* The other thread holds the lock so the contention callback will be + * invoked... + */ + rfifolock_lock(&data->lock); + rfifolock_unlock(&data->lock); + return NULL; +} + +static void test_callback(void) +{ + CallbackTestData data; + QemuThread thread; + int ret; + char c; + + rfifolock_init(&data.lock, rfifolock_cb, &data); + ret = qemu_pipe(data.fd); + g_assert(ret == 0); + + /* Hold lock but allow the callback to kick us by writing to the pipe */ + rfifolock_lock(&data.lock); + qemu_thread_create(&thread, "callback_thread", + callback_thread, &data, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE); + ret = read(data.fd[0], &c, sizeof(c)); + g_assert(ret == 1); + rfifolock_unlock(&data.lock); + /* If we got here then the callback was invoked, as expected */ + + qemu_thread_join(&thread); + close(data.fd[0]); + close(data.fd[1]); + rfifolock_destroy(&data.lock); +} + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL); + g_test_add_func("/nesting", test_nesting); + g_test_add_func("/callback", test_callback); + return g_test_run(); +} |