diff options
author | Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> | 2021-06-24 12:18:09 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> | 2021-07-05 10:51:26 +0100 |
commit | 1d03e5660711c40f79917054328e0dc6bcb879a3 (patch) | |
tree | ffb792629e4a5e975439029c120d3e2506bbce9b /qapi/qapi-visit-core.c | |
parent | 3399bca4514b5c8d513a88fa3e472756468cb4c6 (diff) |
virtiofsd: Don't allow file creation with FUSE_OPEN
A well behaved FUSE client uses FUSE_CREATE to create files. It isn't
supposed to pass O_CREAT along a FUSE_OPEN request, as documented in
the "fuse_lowlevel.h" header :
/**
* Open a file
*
* Open flags are available in fi->flags. The following rules
* apply.
*
* - Creation (O_CREAT, O_EXCL, O_NOCTTY) flags will be
* filtered out / handled by the kernel.
But if the client happens to do it anyway, the server ends up passing
this flag to open() without the mandatory mode_t 4th argument. Since
open() is a variadic function, glibc will happily pass whatever it
finds on the stack to the syscall. If this file is compiled with
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, glibc will even detect that and abort:
*** invalid openat64 call: O_CREAT or O_TMPFILE without mode ***: terminated
Specifying O_CREAT with FUSE_OPEN is a protocol violation. Check this
in do_open(), print out a message and return an error to the client,
EINVAL like we already do when fuse_mbuf_iter_advance() fails.
The FUSE filesystem doesn't currently support O_TMPFILE, but the very
same would happen if O_TMPFILE was passed in a FUSE_OPEN request. Check
that as well.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20210624101809.48032-1-groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'qapi/qapi-visit-core.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions