aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>2020-07-03 16:59:43 +0100
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2020-07-03 16:59:43 +0100
commit2c1fb4d5c0110a994ec6aeb3e57d36fe3aefdad2 (patch)
tree830c9bc86d2993ac4fc6fc0e921fb4b042e7d340 /hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
parent50824a8c45dc07e0f67b32e65d0190cc2e83c397 (diff)
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Only expose flash on older machine types
The flash device is exclusively for the host-controlled firmware, so we should not expose it to the OS. Exposing it risks the OS messing with it, which could break firmware runtime services and surprise the OS when all its changes disappear after reboot. As firmware needs the device and uses DT, we leave the device exposed there. It's up to firmware to remove the nodes from DT before sending it on to the OS. However, there's no need to force firmware to remove tables from ACPI (which it doesn't know how to do anyway), so we simply don't add the tables in the first place. But, as we've been adding the tables for quite some time and don't want to change the default hardware exposed to versioned machines, then we only stop exposing the flash device tables for 5.1 and later machine types. Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com> Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Message-id: 20200629140938.17566-4-drjones@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c')
-rw-r--r--hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
index 1384a2cf2a..91f0df7b13 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
@@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ static void build_fadt_rev5(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
static void
build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms)
{
+ VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(vms);
Aml *scope, *dsdt;
MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
const MemMapEntry *memmap = vms->memmap;
@@ -767,7 +768,9 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms)
acpi_dsdt_add_cpus(scope, vms->smp_cpus);
acpi_dsdt_add_uart(scope, &memmap[VIRT_UART],
(irqmap[VIRT_UART] + ARM_SPI_BASE));
- acpi_dsdt_add_flash(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FLASH]);
+ if (vmc->acpi_expose_flash) {
+ acpi_dsdt_add_flash(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FLASH]);
+ }
acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG]);
acpi_dsdt_add_virtio(scope, &memmap[VIRT_MMIO],
(irqmap[VIRT_MMIO] + ARM_SPI_BASE), NUM_VIRTIO_TRANSPORTS);