diff options
author | Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> | 2014-01-08 10:08:35 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> | 2014-03-10 12:35:04 +0100 |
commit | 12b316d4c173bf07f421ef9dc98ba4b53916066e (patch) | |
tree | 843e39ea377bb7cf66421dada6656aa43ca5c8af /exec.c | |
parent | 6cd859aa8a7fb60fe6edb89e628cddfe25dfe186 (diff) |
ui/vnc: optimize dirty bitmap tracking
vnc_update_client currently scans the dirty bitmap of each client
bitwise which is a very costly operation if only few bits are dirty.
vnc_refresh_server_surface does almost the same.
this patch optimizes both by utilizing the heavily optimized
function find_next_bit to find the offset of the next dirty
bit in the dirty bitmaps.
The following artifical test (just the bitmap operation part) running
vnc_update_client 65536 times on a 2560x2048 surface illustrates the
performance difference:
All bits clean - vnc_update_client_new: 0.07 secs
vnc_update_client_old: 10.98 secs
All bits dirty - vnc_update_client_new: 11.26 secs
vnc_update_client_old: 20.19 secs
Few bits dirty - vnc_update_client_new: 0.08 secs
vnc_update_client_old: 10.98 secs
The case for all bits dirty is still rather slow, this
is due to the implementation of find_and_clear_dirty_height.
This will be addresses in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Reviewed-by: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'exec.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions