aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2017-06-29 15:27:41 +0200
committerFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>2017-07-17 11:28:15 +0800
commit1e886639791762e89b51aa0507f523c6a1448831 (patch)
tree0dd8ee307a4282fc631e8f8a20de6ae4dced666b /block
parent667221c10d05a22573dae1928880bca525f8cd20 (diff)
vdi: make it thread-safe
The VirtualBox driver is using a mutex to order all allocating writes, but it is not protecting accesses to the bitmap because they implicitly happen under the AioContext mutex. Change this to use a CoRwlock explicitly. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170629132749.997-4-pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r--block/vdi.c48
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/block/vdi.c b/block/vdi.c
index 2b6e8fa1ed..8da5dfc897 100644
--- a/block/vdi.c
+++ b/block/vdi.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ typedef struct {
/* VDI header (converted to host endianness). */
VdiHeader header;
- CoMutex write_lock;
+ CoRwlock bmap_lock;
Error *migration_blocker;
} BDRVVdiState;
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int vdi_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags,
goto fail_free_bmap;
}
- qemu_co_mutex_init(&s->write_lock);
+ qemu_co_rwlock_init(&s->bmap_lock);
return 0;
@@ -557,7 +557,9 @@ vdi_co_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
n_bytes, offset);
/* prepare next AIO request */
+ qemu_co_rwlock_rdlock(&s->bmap_lock);
bmap_entry = le32_to_cpu(s->bmap[block_index]);
+ qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&s->bmap_lock);
if (!VDI_IS_ALLOCATED(bmap_entry)) {
/* Block not allocated, return zeros, no need to wait. */
qemu_iovec_memset(qiov, bytes_done, 0, n_bytes);
@@ -595,6 +597,7 @@ vdi_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
uint32_t block_index;
uint32_t offset_in_block;
uint32_t n_bytes;
+ uint64_t data_offset;
uint32_t bmap_first = VDI_UNALLOCATED;
uint32_t bmap_last = VDI_UNALLOCATED;
uint8_t *block = NULL;
@@ -614,10 +617,19 @@ vdi_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
n_bytes, offset);
/* prepare next AIO request */
+ qemu_co_rwlock_rdlock(&s->bmap_lock);
bmap_entry = le32_to_cpu(s->bmap[block_index]);
if (!VDI_IS_ALLOCATED(bmap_entry)) {
/* Allocate new block and write to it. */
uint64_t data_offset;
+ qemu_co_rwlock_upgrade(&s->bmap_lock);
+ bmap_entry = le32_to_cpu(s->bmap[block_index]);
+ if (VDI_IS_ALLOCATED(bmap_entry)) {
+ /* A concurrent allocation did the work for us. */
+ qemu_co_rwlock_downgrade(&s->bmap_lock);
+ goto nonallocating_write;
+ }
+
bmap_entry = s->header.blocks_allocated;
s->bmap[block_index] = cpu_to_le32(bmap_entry);
s->header.blocks_allocated++;
@@ -635,30 +647,18 @@ vdi_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
memset(block + offset_in_block + n_bytes, 0,
s->block_size - n_bytes - offset_in_block);
- /* Note that this coroutine does not yield anywhere from reading the
- * bmap entry until here, so in regards to all the coroutines trying
- * to write to this cluster, the one doing the allocation will
- * always be the first to try to acquire the lock.
- * Therefore, it is also the first that will actually be able to
- * acquire the lock and thus the padded cluster is written before
- * the other coroutines can write to the affected area. */
- qemu_co_mutex_lock(&s->write_lock);
+ /* Write the new block under CoRwLock write-side protection,
+ * so this full-cluster write does not overlap a partial write
+ * of the same cluster, issued from the "else" branch.
+ */
ret = bdrv_pwrite(bs->file, data_offset, block, s->block_size);
- qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&s->write_lock);
+ qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&s->bmap_lock);
} else {
- uint64_t data_offset = s->header.offset_data +
- (uint64_t)bmap_entry * s->block_size +
- offset_in_block;
- qemu_co_mutex_lock(&s->write_lock);
- /* This lock is only used to make sure the following write operation
- * is executed after the write issued by the coroutine allocating
- * this cluster, therefore we do not need to keep it locked.
- * As stated above, the allocating coroutine will always try to lock
- * the mutex before all the other concurrent accesses to that
- * cluster, therefore at this point we can be absolutely certain
- * that that write operation has returned (there may be other writes
- * in flight, but they do not concern this very operation). */
- qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&s->write_lock);
+nonallocating_write:
+ data_offset = s->header.offset_data +
+ (uint64_t)bmap_entry * s->block_size +
+ offset_in_block;
+ qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&s->bmap_lock);
qemu_iovec_reset(&local_qiov);
qemu_iovec_concat(&local_qiov, qiov, bytes_done, n_bytes);