aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>2014-05-11 18:37:00 +0200
committerAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>2014-06-16 13:24:33 +0200
commit08215d8fd8ca15425401adc9e01361cbc6882402 (patch)
tree4b48cf5232f63e81799c4a2b03873d0c580f9225
parentc15424531f2406cf5ad9f02d35204fac98601696 (diff)
KVM: PPC: Don't secretly add 1T segment feature to CPU
When we select a CPU type that does not support 1TB segments, we should not expose 1TB just because KVM supports 1TB segments. User configuration always wins over feature availability. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
-rw-r--r--target-ppc/kvm.c8
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
index 35693674e9..0744f51a3b 100644
--- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
@@ -356,6 +356,10 @@ static void kvm_fixup_page_sizes(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
/* Convert to QEMU form */
memset(&env->sps, 0, sizeof(env->sps));
+ /*
+ * XXX This loop should be an entry wide AND of the capabilities that
+ * the selected CPU has with the capabilities that KVM supports.
+ */
for (ik = iq = 0; ik < KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_MAX_SZ; ik++) {
struct ppc_one_seg_page_size *qsps = &env->sps.sps[iq];
struct kvm_ppc_one_seg_page_size *ksps = &smmu_info.sps[ik];
@@ -382,9 +386,7 @@ static void kvm_fixup_page_sizes(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
}
}
env->slb_nr = smmu_info.slb_size;
- if (smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS) {
- env->mmu_model |= POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG;
- } else {
+ if (!(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS)) {
env->mmu_model &= ~POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG;
}
}