#!/usr/bin/env python3 # Copyright (c) 2018-2022 The Bitcoin Core developers # Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying # file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. """Test the wallet balance RPC methods.""" from decimal import Decimal import struct from test_framework.address import ADDRESS_BCRT1_UNSPENDABLE as ADDRESS_WATCHONLY from test_framework.blocktools import COINBASE_MATURITY from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework from test_framework.util import ( assert_equal, assert_is_hash_string, assert_raises_rpc_error, ) def create_transactions(node, address, amt, fees): # Create and sign raw transactions from node to address for amt. # Creates a transaction for each fee and returns an array # of the raw transactions. utxos = [u for u in node.listunspent(0) if u['spendable']] # Create transactions inputs = [] ins_total = 0 for utxo in utxos: inputs.append({"txid": utxo["txid"], "vout": utxo["vout"]}) ins_total += utxo['amount'] if ins_total >= amt + max(fees): break # make sure there was enough utxos assert ins_total >= amt + max(fees) txs = [] for fee in fees: outputs = {address: amt} # prevent 0 change output if ins_total > amt + fee: outputs[node.getrawchangeaddress()] = ins_total - amt - fee raw_tx = node.createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs, 0, True) raw_tx = node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(raw_tx) assert_equal(raw_tx['complete'], True) txs.append(raw_tx) return txs class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework): def add_options(self, parser): self.add_wallet_options(parser) def set_test_params(self): self.num_nodes = 2 self.setup_clean_chain = True self.extra_args = [ # Limit mempool descendants as a hack to have wallet txs rejected from the mempool. # Set walletrejectlongchains=0 so the wallet still creates the transactions. ['-limitdescendantcount=3', '-walletrejectlongchains=0'], [], ] # whitelist peers to speed up tx relay / mempool sync for args in self.extra_args: args.append("-whitelist=noban@127.0.0.1") def skip_test_if_missing_module(self): self.skip_if_no_wallet() def run_test(self): if not self.options.descriptors: # Tests legacy watchonly behavior which is not present (and does not need to be tested) in descriptor wallets self.nodes[0].importaddress(ADDRESS_WATCHONLY) # Check that nodes don't own any UTXOs assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent()), 0) assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].listunspent()), 0) self.log.info("Check that only node 0 is watching an address") assert 'watchonly' in self.nodes[0].getbalances() assert 'watchonly' not in self.nodes[1].getbalances() self.log.info("Mining blocks ...") self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1) self.generate(self.nodes[1], 1) # Verify listunspent returns immature coinbase if 'include_immature_coinbase' is set assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent(query_options={'include_immature_coinbase': True})), 1) assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent(query_options={'include_immature_coinbase': False})), 0) self.generatetoaddress(self.nodes[1], COINBASE_MATURITY + 1, ADDRESS_WATCHONLY) # Verify listunspent returns all immature coinbases if 'include_immature_coinbase' is set # For now, only the legacy wallet will see the coinbases going to the imported 'ADDRESS_WATCHONLY' assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent(query_options={'include_immature_coinbase': False})), 1 if self.options.descriptors else 2) assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listunspent(query_options={'include_immature_coinbase': True})), 1 if self.options.descriptors else COINBASE_MATURITY + 2) if not self.options.descriptors: # Tests legacy watchonly behavior which is not present (and does not need to be tested) in descriptor wallets assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']['trusted'], 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()['balance'], 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['trusted'], 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalances()['watchonly']['immature'], 5000) assert 'watchonly' not in self.nodes[1].getbalances() assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), 50) self.log.info("Test getbalance with different arguments") assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("*"), 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("*", 1), 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=1), 50) if not self.options.descriptors: assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0, include_watchonly=True), 100) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("*", 1, True), 100) else: assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0, include_watchonly=True), 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("*", 1, True), 50) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(minconf=0, include_watchonly=True), 50) # Send 40 BTC from 0 to 1 and 60 BTC from 1 to 0. txs = create_transactions(self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(), 40, [Decimal('0.01')]) self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(txs[0]['hex']) self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(txs[0]['hex']) # sending on both nodes is faster than waiting for propagation self.sync_all() txs = create_transactions(self.nodes[1], self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 60, [Decimal('0.01'), Decimal('0.02')]) self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(txs[0]['hex']) self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(txs[0]['hex']) # sending on both nodes is faster than waiting for propagation self.sync_all() # First argument of getbalance must be set to "*" assert_raises_rpc_error(-32, "dummy first argument must be excluded or set to \"*\"", self.nodes[1].getbalance, "") self.log.info("Test balances with unconfirmed inputs") # Before `test_balance()`, we have had two nodes with a balance of 50 # each and then we: # # 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01 # 2) Sent 60 from node B to node A with fee 0.01 # # Then we check the balances: # # 1) As is # 2) With transaction 2 from above with 2x the fee # # Prior to #16766, in this situation, the node would immediately report # a balance of 30 on node B as unconfirmed and trusted. # # After #16766, we show that balance as unconfirmed. # # The balance is indeed "trusted" and "confirmed" insofar as removing # the mempool transactions would return at least that much money. But # the algorithm after #16766 marks it as unconfirmed because the 'taint' # tracking of transaction trust for summing balances doesn't consider # which inputs belong to a user. In this case, the change output in # question could be "destroyed" by replace the 1st transaction above. # # The post #16766 behavior is correct; we shouldn't be treating those # funds as confirmed. If you want to rely on that specific UTXO existing # which has given you that balance, you cannot, as a third party # spending the other input would destroy that unconfirmed. # # For example, if the test transactions were: # # 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01 # 2) Sent 10 from node B to node A with fee 0.01 # # Then our node would report a confirmed balance of 40 + 50 - 10 = 80 # BTC, which is more than would be available if transaction 1 were # replaced. def test_balances(*, fee_node_1=0): # getbalances expected_balances_0 = {'mine': {'immature': Decimal('0E-8'), 'trusted': Decimal('9.99'), # change from node 0's send 'untrusted_pending': Decimal('60.0')}, 'watchonly': {'immature': Decimal('5000'), 'trusted': Decimal('50.0'), 'untrusted_pending': Decimal('0E-8')}} expected_balances_1 = {'mine': {'immature': Decimal('0E-8'), 'trusted': Decimal('0E-8'), # node 1's send had an unsafe input 'untrusted_pending': Decimal('30.0') - fee_node_1}} # Doesn't include output of node 0's send since it was spent if self.options.descriptors: del expected_balances_0["watchonly"] balances_0 = self.nodes[0].getbalances() balances_1 = self.nodes[1].getbalances() # remove lastprocessedblock keys (they will be tested later) del balances_0['lastprocessedblock'] del balances_1['lastprocessedblock'] assert_equal(balances_0, expected_balances_0) assert_equal(balances_1, expected_balances_1) # getbalance without any arguments includes unconfirmed transactions, but not untrusted transactions assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('9.99')) # change from node 0's send assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), Decimal('0')) # node 1's send had an unsafe input # Same with minconf=0 assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0), Decimal('9.99')) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(minconf=0), Decimal('0')) # getbalance with a minconf incorrectly excludes coins that have been spent more recently than the minconf blocks ago # TODO: fix getbalance tracking of coin spentness depth assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=1), Decimal('0')) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(minconf=1), Decimal('0')) # getunconfirmedbalance assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance(), Decimal('60')) # output of node 1's spend assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getunconfirmedbalance(), Decimal('30') - fee_node_1) # Doesn't include output of node 0's send since it was spent # getwalletinfo.unconfirmed_balance assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()["unconfirmed_balance"], Decimal('60')) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getwalletinfo()["unconfirmed_balance"], Decimal('30') - fee_node_1) test_balances(fee_node_1=Decimal('0.01')) # Node 1 bumps the transaction fee and resends self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(txs[1]['hex']) self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(txs[1]['hex']) # sending on both nodes is faster than waiting for propagation self.sync_all() self.log.info("Test getbalance and getbalances.mine.untrusted_pending with conflicted unconfirmed inputs") test_balances(fee_node_1=Decimal('0.02')) self.generatetoaddress(self.nodes[1], 1, ADDRESS_WATCHONLY) # balances are correct after the transactions are confirmed balance_node0 = Decimal('69.99') # node 1's send plus change from node 0's send balance_node1 = Decimal('29.98') # change from node 0's send assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']['trusted'], balance_node0) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['trusted'], balance_node1) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance_node0) assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), balance_node1) # Send total balance away from node 1 txs = create_transactions(self.nodes[1], self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal('29.97'), [Decimal('0.01')]) self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(txs[0]['hex']) self.generatetoaddress(self.nodes[1], 2, ADDRESS_WATCHONLY) # getbalance with a minconf incorrectly excludes coins that have been spent more recently than the minconf blocks ago # TODO: fix getbalance tracking of coin spentness depth # getbalance with minconf=3 should still show the old balance assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(minconf=3), Decimal('0')) # getbalance with minconf=2 will show the new balance. assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(minconf=2), Decimal('0')) # check mempool transactions count for wallet unconfirmed balance after # dynamically loading the wallet. before = self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['untrusted_pending'] dst = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress() self.nodes[1].unloadwallet(self.default_wallet_name) self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(dst, 0.1) self.sync_all() self.nodes[1].loadwallet(self.default_wallet_name) after = self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['untrusted_pending'] assert_equal(before + Decimal('0.1'), after) # Create 3 more wallet txs, where the last is not accepted to the # mempool because it is the third descendant of the tx above for _ in range(3): # Set amount high enough such that all coins are spent by each tx txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 99) self.log.info('Check that wallet txs not in the mempool are untrusted') assert txid not in self.nodes[0].getrawmempool() assert_equal(self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)['trusted'], False) assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(minconf=0), 0) self.log.info("Test replacement and reorg of non-mempool tx") tx_orig = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)['hex'] # Increase fee by 1 coin tx_replace = tx_orig.replace( struct.pack("