// Copyright (c) 2023 The Bitcoin Core developers // Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying // file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. // #include #include #include #include BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(disconnected_transactions, TestChain100Setup) //! Tests that DisconnectedBlockTransactions limits its own memory properly BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(disconnectpool_memory_limits) { // Use the coinbase transactions from TestChain100Setup. It doesn't matter whether these // transactions would realistically be in a block together, they just need distinct txids and // uniform size for this test to work. std::vector block_vtx(m_coinbase_txns); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.size(), 100); // Roughly estimate sizes to sanity check that DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage // is within an expected range. // Overhead for the hashmap depends on number of buckets std::unordered_map temp_map; temp_map.reserve(1); const size_t MAP_1{memusage::DynamicUsage(temp_map)}; temp_map.reserve(100); const size_t MAP_100{memusage::DynamicUsage(temp_map)}; const size_t TX_USAGE{RecursiveDynamicUsage(block_vtx.front())}; for (const auto& tx : block_vtx) BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(RecursiveDynamicUsage(tx), TX_USAGE); // Our overall formula is unordered map overhead + usage per entry. // Implementations may vary, but we're trying to guess the usage of data structures. const size_t ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE{ TX_USAGE // list entry: 2 pointers (next pointer and prev pointer) + element itself + memusage::MallocUsage((2 * sizeof(void*)) + sizeof(decltype(block_vtx)::value_type)) // unordered map: 1 pointer for the hashtable + key and value + memusage::MallocUsage(sizeof(void*) + sizeof(decltype(temp_map)::key_type) + sizeof(decltype(temp_map)::value_type))}; // DisconnectedBlockTransactions that's just big enough for 1 transaction. { DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAP_1 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE}; // Add just 2 (and not all 100) transactions to keep the unordered map's hashtable overhead // to a minimum and avoid all (instead of all but 1) transactions getting evicted. std::vector two_txns({block_vtx.at(0), block_vtx.at(1)}); auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(two_txns)}; BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= MAP_1 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE); // Only 1 transaction can be kept BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(1, evicted_txns.size()); // Transactions are added from back to front and eviction is FIFO. BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.at(1), evicted_txns.front()); disconnectpool.clear(); } // DisconnectedBlockTransactions with a comfortable maximum memory usage so that nothing is evicted. // Record usage so we can check size limiting in the next test. size_t usage_full{0}; { const size_t USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE{MAP_100 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE * 100}; DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE}; auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(block_vtx)}; BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(evicted_txns.size(), 0); BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE); usage_full = disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage(); disconnectpool.clear(); } // DisconnectedBlockTransactions that's just a little too small for all of the transactions. { const size_t MAX_MEMUSAGE_99{usage_full - sizeof(void*)}; DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_MEMUSAGE_99}; auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(block_vtx)}; BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= MAX_MEMUSAGE_99); // Only 1 transaction needed to be evicted BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(1, evicted_txns.size()); // Transactions are added from back to front and eviction is FIFO. // The last transaction of block_vtx should be the first to be evicted. BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.back(), evicted_txns.front()); disconnectpool.clear(); } } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()