From 51f278329d43398428d60f5986f8d29a2041d28d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pieter Wuille Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:10:57 +0200 Subject: Make removed and conflicted arguments optional to remove --- src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp | 2 +- src/test/mempool_tests.cpp | 27 ++++++++++++--------------- src/test/miner_tests.cpp | 3 +-- src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp | 11 +++++------ 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/test') diff --git a/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp b/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp index 7530b013bd..f3f1befbc0 100644 --- a/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/blockencodings_tests.cpp @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(SimpleRoundTripTest) BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.mapTx.find(block.vtx[2].GetHash())->GetSharedTx().use_count(), SHARED_TX_OFFSET + 1); std::list removed; - pool.removeRecursive(block.vtx[2], removed); + pool.removeRecursive(block.vtx[2], &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 1); CBlock block2; diff --git a/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp b/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp index 033a50f94f..003daa203f 100644 --- a/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/mempool_tests.cpp @@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolRemoveTest) std::list removed; // Nothing in pool, remove should do nothing: - testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 0); // Just the parent: testPool.addUnchecked(txParent.GetHash(), entry.FromTx(txParent)); - testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 1); removed.clear(); @@ -75,16 +75,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolRemoveTest) testPool.addUnchecked(txGrandChild[i].GetHash(), entry.FromTx(txGrandChild[i])); } // Remove Child[0], GrandChild[0] should be removed: - testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 2); removed.clear(); // ... make sure grandchild and child are gone: - testPool.removeRecursive(txGrandChild[0], removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txGrandChild[0], &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 0); - testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txChild[0], &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 0); // Remove parent, all children/grandchildren should go: - testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 5); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(testPool.size(), 0); removed.clear(); @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolRemoveTest) } // Now remove the parent, as might happen if a block-re-org occurs but the parent cannot be // put into the mempool (maybe because it is non-standard): - testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, removed); + testPool.removeRecursive(txParent, &removed); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(removed.size(), 6); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(testPool.size(), 0); removed.clear(); @@ -281,12 +281,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolIndexingTest) BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.size(), 10); // Now try removing tx10 and verify the sort order returns to normal - std::list removed; - pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx10.GetHash())->GetTx(), removed); + pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx10.GetHash())->GetTx()); CheckSort(pool, snapshotOrder); - pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx9.GetHash())->GetTx(), removed); - pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx8.GetHash())->GetTx(), removed); + pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx9.GetHash())->GetTx()); + pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx8.GetHash())->GetTx()); /* Now check the sort on the mining score index. * Final order should be: * @@ -413,8 +412,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolAncestorIndexingTest) /* after tx6 is mined, tx7 should move up in the sort */ std::vector vtx; vtx.push_back(tx6); - std::list dummy; - pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1, dummy, false); + pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1, NULL, false); sortedOrder.erase(sortedOrder.begin()+1); sortedOrder.pop_back(); @@ -549,12 +547,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolSizeLimitTest) pool.addUnchecked(tx7.GetHash(), entry.Fee(9000LL).FromTx(tx7, &pool)); std::vector vtx; - std::list conflicts; SetMockTime(42); SetMockTime(42 + CTxMemPool::ROLLING_FEE_HALFLIFE); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK(), maxFeeRateRemoved.GetFeePerK() + 1000); // ... we should keep the same min fee until we get a block - pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1, conflicts); + pool.removeForBlock(vtx, 1); SetMockTime(42 + 2*CTxMemPool::ROLLING_FEE_HALFLIFE); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK(), (maxFeeRateRemoved.GetFeePerK() + 1000)/2); // ... then feerate should drop 1/2 each halflife diff --git a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp index d6d7b5716e..a94979fd77 100644 --- a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp @@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ void TestPackageSelection(const CChainParams& chainparams, CScript scriptPubKey, // Test that packages above the min relay fee do get included, even if one // of the transactions is below the min relay fee // Remove the low fee transaction and replace with a higher fee transaction - std::list dummy; - mempool.removeRecursive(tx, dummy); + mempool.removeRecursive(tx); tx.vout[0].nValue -= 2; // Now we should be just over the min relay fee hashLowFeeTx = tx.GetHash(); mempool.addUnchecked(hashLowFeeTx, entry.Fee(feeToUse+2).FromTx(tx)); diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp index 5c902387f1..f57c24270c 100644 --- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 128; i++) garbage.push_back('X'); CMutableTransaction tx; - std::list dummyConflicted; tx.vin.resize(1); tx.vin[0].scriptSig = garbage; tx.vout.resize(1); @@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) txHashes[9-h].pop_back(); } } - mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted); + mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); block.clear(); if (blocknum == 30) { // At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points @@ -125,7 +124,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) // Mine 50 more blocks with no transactions happening, estimates shouldn't change // We haven't decayed the moving average enough so we still have enough data points in every bucket while (blocknum < 250) - mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted); + mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee); @@ -146,7 +145,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) txHashes[j].push_back(hash); } } - mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted); + mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); } int answerFound; @@ -167,7 +166,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) txHashes[j].pop_back(); } } - mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265, dummyConflicted); + mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265); block.clear(); for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); @@ -187,7 +186,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) block.push_back(*ptx); } } - mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum, dummyConflicted); + mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); block.clear(); } for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) { -- cgit v1.2.3