From 197c3760ff07daeecbb726a0cfef899502520ee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Morcos Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:34:04 -0500 Subject: fix sdaftuar's nits again it boggles the mind why these nits can't be delivered on a more timely basis --- src/main.cpp | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/main.cpp') diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index 1bc02c0943..bdb085bbd1 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -803,10 +803,10 @@ bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags) index.pprev = tip; // CheckSequenceLocks() uses chainActive.Height()+1 to evaluate // height based locks because when SequenceLocks() is called within - // CBlock::AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being* - // evaluated is what is used. Thus if we want to know if a - // transaction can be part of the *next* block, we need to call - // SequenceLocks() with one more than chainActive.Height(). + // ConnectBlock(), the height of the block *being* + // evaluated is what is used. + // Thus if we want to know if a transaction can be part of the + // *next* block, we need to use one more than chainActive.Height() index.nHeight = tip->nHeight + 1; // pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip() @@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pin } if (!SequenceLocks(tx, nLockTimeFlags, &prevheights, *pindex)) { - return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__), + return state.DoS(100, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal"); } -- cgit v1.2.3