From fd311996e877d567a4e34a19b47e94d66e07100a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:00:32 -0400
Subject: consensus: don't use arith_uint256 in consensus.h

Requiring arith_uint256 at such a base level is not good for modularity.
---
 src/consensus/params.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/consensus')

diff --git a/src/consensus/params.h b/src/consensus/params.h
index c4cfa48c7e..35d447b712 100644
--- a/src/consensus/params.h
+++ b/src/consensus/params.h
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 #ifndef BITCOIN_CONSENSUS_CONSENSUS_PARAMS_H
 #define BITCOIN_CONSENSUS_CONSENSUS_PARAMS_H
 
-#include "arith_uint256.h"
 #include "uint256.h"
 
 namespace Consensus {
@@ -21,7 +20,7 @@ struct Params {
     int nMajorityRejectBlockOutdated;
     int nMajorityWindow;
     /** Proof of work parameters */
-    arith_uint256 powLimit;
+    uint256 powLimit;
     bool fPowAllowMinDifficultyBlocks;
     int64_t nPowTargetSpacing;
     int64_t nPowTargetTimespan;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3