From 0ae42a16c766a7ecb8711bfad6f22b8581ea0258 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl Dong Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:20:48 -0400 Subject: guix: Remove now-unnecessary gcc make flag Previously, Guix would produce a gcc which did not know to use the SSP function from glibc, and required a gcc make flag for it to do so, in my attempt to fix it upstream I realized that this is no longer the case. This can be verified by performing a Guix build and doing readelf -s ... | grep __stack_chk to check that symbols are coming from glibc, and doing readelf -d ... | grep NEEDED | grep ssp to see that libssp.so is not being depended on --- contrib/guix/manifest.scm | 14 +------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'contrib/guix') diff --git a/contrib/guix/manifest.scm b/contrib/guix/manifest.scm index 23b656cad7..c25ac2977b 100644 --- a/contrib/guix/manifest.scm +++ b/contrib/guix/manifest.scm @@ -21,17 +21,6 @@ (guix profiles) (guix utils)) -(define (make-ssp-fixed-gcc xgcc) - "Given a XGCC package, return a modified package that uses the SSP function -from glibc instead of from libssp.so. Taken from: -http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs/view/development/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html" - (package - (inherit xgcc) - (arguments - (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments xgcc) - ((#:make-flags flags) - `(cons "gcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp=yes" ,flags)))))) - (define (make-gcc-rpath-link xgcc) "Given a XGCC package, return a modified package that replace each instance of -rpath in the default system spec that's inserted by Guix with -rpath-link" @@ -104,8 +93,7 @@ chain for " target " development.")) (base-gcc-for-libc gcc-5) (base-kernel-headers linux-libre-headers-4.19) (base-libc glibc-2.27) - (base-gcc (make-gcc-rpath-link - (make-ssp-fixed-gcc gcc-9)))) + (base-gcc (make-gcc-rpath-link gcc-9))) "Convenience wrapper around MAKE-CROSS-TOOLCHAIN with default values desirable for building Bitcoin Core release binaries." (make-cross-toolchain target -- cgit v1.2.3