From fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Towns Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:49:22 +1000 Subject: [refactor] txmempool: split epoch logic into class --- src/Makefile.am | 1 + src/txmempool.cpp | 23 ++----------- src/txmempool.h | 55 ++++++++----------------------- src/util/epochguard.h | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/util/epochguard.h diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am index 2616eb8638..3b64d4a1df 100644 --- a/src/Makefile.am +++ b/src/Makefile.am @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ BITCOIN_CORE_H = \ util/bip32.h \ util/bytevectorhash.h \ util/check.h \ + util/epochguard.h \ util/error.h \ util/fees.h \ util/golombrice.h \ diff --git a/src/txmempool.cpp b/src/txmempool.cpp index 9fa7b4e251..773149ae97 100644 --- a/src/txmempool.cpp +++ b/src/txmempool.cpp @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ CTxMemPoolEntry::CTxMemPoolEntry(const CTransactionRef& _tx, const CAmount& _nFe int64_t _nTime, unsigned int _entryHeight, bool _spendsCoinbase, int64_t _sigOpsCost, LockPoints lp) : tx(_tx), nFee(_nFee), nTxWeight(GetTransactionWeight(*tx)), nUsageSize(RecursiveDynamicUsage(tx)), nTime(_nTime), entryHeight(_entryHeight), - spendsCoinbase(_spendsCoinbase), sigOpCost(_sigOpsCost), lockPoints(lp), m_epoch(0) + spendsCoinbase(_spendsCoinbase), sigOpCost(_sigOpsCost), lockPoints(lp) { nCountWithDescendants = 1; nSizeWithDescendants = GetTxSize(); @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector &vHashes // include them, and update their CTxMemPoolEntry::m_parents to include this tx. // we cache the in-mempool children to avoid duplicate updates { - const auto epoch = GetFreshEpoch(); + WITH_FRESH_EPOCH(m_epoch); for (; iter != mapNextTx.end() && iter->first->hash == hash; ++iter) { const uint256 &childHash = iter->second->GetHash(); txiter childIter = mapTx.find(childHash); @@ -1117,22 +1117,3 @@ void CTxMemPool::SetIsLoaded(bool loaded) LOCK(cs); m_is_loaded = loaded; } - - -CTxMemPool::EpochGuard CTxMemPool::GetFreshEpoch() const -{ - return EpochGuard(*this); -} -CTxMemPool::EpochGuard::EpochGuard(const CTxMemPool& in) : pool(in) -{ - assert(!pool.m_has_epoch_guard); - ++pool.m_epoch; - pool.m_has_epoch_guard = true; -} - -CTxMemPool::EpochGuard::~EpochGuard() -{ - // prevents stale results being used - ++pool.m_epoch; - pool.m_has_epoch_guard = false; -} diff --git a/src/txmempool.h b/src/txmempool.h index c0df33fe13..7b8fe28ad7 100644 --- a/src/txmempool.h +++ b/src/txmempool.h @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ struct CompareIteratorByHash { return a->GetTx().GetHash() < b->GetTx().GetHash(); } }; + /** \class CTxMemPoolEntry * * CTxMemPoolEntry stores data about the corresponding transaction, as well @@ -155,7 +157,7 @@ public: Children& GetMemPoolChildren() const { return m_children; } mutable size_t vTxHashesIdx; //!< Index in mempool's vTxHashes - mutable uint64_t m_epoch; //!< epoch when last touched, useful for graph algorithms + mutable Epoch::Marker m_epoch_marker; //!< epoch when last touched, useful for graph algorithms }; // Helpers for modifying CTxMemPool::mapTx, which is a boost multi_index. @@ -485,8 +487,7 @@ private: mutable int64_t lastRollingFeeUpdate; mutable bool blockSinceLastRollingFeeBump; mutable double rollingMinimumFeeRate; //!< minimum fee to get into the pool, decreases exponentially - mutable uint64_t m_epoch{0}; - mutable bool m_has_epoch_guard{false}; + mutable Epoch m_epoch GUARDED_BY(cs); // In-memory counter for external mempool tracking purposes. // This number is incremented once every time a transaction @@ -665,7 +666,7 @@ public: * for). Note: vHashesToUpdate should be the set of transactions from the * disconnected block that have been accepted back into the mempool. */ - void UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector& vHashesToUpdate) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main); + void UpdateTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector& vHashesToUpdate) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main) LOCKS_EXCLUDED(m_epoch); /** Try to calculate all in-mempool ancestors of entry. * (these are all calculated including the tx itself) @@ -826,52 +827,22 @@ private: */ void removeUnchecked(txiter entry, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); public: - /** EpochGuard: RAII-style guard for using epoch-based graph traversal algorithms. - * When walking ancestors or descendants, we generally want to avoid - * visiting the same transactions twice. Some traversal algorithms use - * std::set (or setEntries) to deduplicate the transaction we visit. - * However, use of std::set is algorithmically undesirable because it both - * adds an asymptotic factor of O(log n) to traverals cost and triggers O(n) - * more dynamic memory allocations. - * In many algorithms we can replace std::set with an internal mempool - * counter to track the time (or, "epoch") that we began a traversal, and - * check + update a per-transaction epoch for each transaction we look at to - * determine if that transaction has not yet been visited during the current - * traversal's epoch. - * Algorithms using std::set can be replaced on a one by one basis. - * Both techniques are not fundamentally incompatible across the codebase. - * Generally speaking, however, the remaining use of std::set for mempool - * traversal should be viewed as a TODO for replacement with an epoch based - * traversal, rather than a preference for std::set over epochs in that - * algorithm. - */ - class EpochGuard { - const CTxMemPool& pool; - public: - explicit EpochGuard(const CTxMemPool& in); - ~EpochGuard(); - }; - // N.B. GetFreshEpoch modifies mutable state via the EpochGuard construction - // (and later destruction) - EpochGuard GetFreshEpoch() const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); - /** visited marks a CTxMemPoolEntry as having been traversed - * during the lifetime of the most recently created EpochGuard + * during the lifetime of the most recently created Epoch::Guard * and returns false if we are the first visitor, true otherwise. * - * An EpochGuard must be held when visited is called or an assert will be + * An Epoch::Guard must be held when visited is called or an assert will be * triggered. * */ - bool visited(txiter it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs) { - assert(m_has_epoch_guard); - bool ret = it->m_epoch >= m_epoch; - it->m_epoch = std::max(it->m_epoch, m_epoch); - return ret; + bool visited(const txiter it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, m_epoch) + { + return m_epoch.visited(it->m_epoch_marker); } - bool visited(Optional it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs) { - assert(m_has_epoch_guard); + bool visited(Optional it) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, m_epoch) + { + assert(m_epoch.guarded()); // verify guard even when it==nullopt return !it || visited(*it); } }; diff --git a/src/util/epochguard.h b/src/util/epochguard.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1570ec4eb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/util/epochguard.h @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +// Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto +// Copyright (c) 2009-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers +// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying +// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. + +#ifndef BITCOIN_UTIL_EPOCHGUARD_H +#define BITCOIN_UTIL_EPOCHGUARD_H + +#include + +#include + +/** Epoch: RAII-style guard for using epoch-based graph traversal algorithms. + * When walking ancestors or descendants, we generally want to avoid + * visiting the same transactions twice. Some traversal algorithms use + * std::set (or setEntries) to deduplicate the transaction we visit. + * However, use of std::set is algorithmically undesirable because it both + * adds an asymptotic factor of O(log n) to traversals cost and triggers O(n) + * more dynamic memory allocations. + * In many algorithms we can replace std::set with an internal mempool + * counter to track the time (or, "epoch") that we began a traversal, and + * check + update a per-transaction epoch for each transaction we look at to + * determine if that transaction has not yet been visited during the current + * traversal's epoch. + * Algorithms using std::set can be replaced on a one by one basis. + * Both techniques are not fundamentally incompatible across the codebase. + * Generally speaking, however, the remaining use of std::set for mempool + * traversal should be viewed as a TODO for replacement with an epoch based + * traversal, rather than a preference for std::set over epochs in that + * algorithm. + */ + +class LOCKABLE Epoch +{ +private: + uint64_t m_raw_epoch = 0; + bool m_guarded = false; + +public: + Epoch() = default; + Epoch(const Epoch&) = delete; + Epoch& operator=(const Epoch&) = delete; + + bool guarded() const { return m_guarded; } + + class Marker + { + private: + uint64_t m_marker = 0; + + // only allow modification via Epoch member functions + friend class Epoch; + Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete; + }; + + class SCOPED_LOCKABLE Guard + { + private: + Epoch& m_epoch; + + public: + explicit Guard(Epoch& epoch) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(epoch) : m_epoch(epoch) + { + assert(!m_epoch.m_guarded); + ++m_epoch.m_raw_epoch; + m_epoch.m_guarded = true; + } + ~Guard() UNLOCK_FUNCTION() + { + assert(m_epoch.m_guarded); + ++m_epoch.m_raw_epoch; // ensure clear separation between epochs + m_epoch.m_guarded = false; + } + }; + + bool visited(Marker& marker) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(*this) + { + assert(m_guarded); + if (marker.m_marker < m_raw_epoch) { + // marker is from a previous epoch, so this is its first visit + marker.m_marker = m_raw_epoch; + return false; + } else { + return true; + } + } +}; + +#define WITH_FRESH_EPOCH(epoch) const Epoch::Guard PASTE2(epoch_guard_, __COUNTER__)(epoch) + +#endif // BITCOIN_UTIL_EPOCHGUARD_H -- cgit v1.2.3