From 88729d804e39fbb42aa92c039afe3641edf9190c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Jonas Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:42:06 -0400 Subject: Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock listsinceblock now checks that returned transactions are not conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by the given blockhash Co-Authored-By: Michael Chrostowski Github-Pull: #17258 Rebased-From: 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 --- src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp | 2 +- test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp b/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp index 96fa50d42e..2b1f9f3752 100644 --- a/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp +++ b/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ static UniValue listsinceblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request) for (const std::pair& pairWtx : pwallet->mapWallet) { CWalletTx tx = pairWtx.second; - if (depth == -1 || tx.GetDepthInMainChain(*locked_chain) < depth) { + if (depth == -1 || abs(tx.GetDepthInMainChain(*locked_chain)) < depth) { ListTransactions(*locked_chain, pwallet, tx, 0, true, transactions, filter, nullptr /* filter_label */); } } diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py b/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py index 4aeb393255..455e89e310 100755 --- a/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py +++ b/test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ """Test the listsincelast RPC.""" from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework +from test_framework.messages import BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER from test_framework.util import ( assert_array_result, assert_equal, @@ -12,6 +13,7 @@ from test_framework.util import ( connect_nodes, ) +from decimal import Decimal class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): def set_test_params(self): @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): self.test_reorg() self.test_double_spend() self.test_double_send() + self.double_spends_filtered() def test_no_blockhash(self): txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1) @@ -291,5 +294,51 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): if tx['txid'] == txid1: assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2) + def double_spends_filtered(self): + ''' + `listsinceblock` was returning conflicted transactions even if they + occurred before the specified cutoff blockhash + ''' + spending_node = self.nodes[2] + dest_address = spending_node.getnewaddress() + + tx_input = dict( + sequence=BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER, **next(u for u in spending_node.listunspent())) + rawtx = spending_node.createrawtransaction( + [tx_input], {dest_address: tx_input["amount"] - Decimal("0.00051000"), + spending_node.getrawchangeaddress(): Decimal("0.00050000")}) + signedtx = spending_node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx) + orig_tx_id = spending_node.sendrawtransaction(signedtx["hex"]) + original_tx = spending_node.gettransaction(orig_tx_id) + + double_tx = spending_node.bumpfee(orig_tx_id) + + # check that both transactions exist + block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock( + spending_node.getblockhash(spending_node.getblockcount())) + original_found = False + double_found = False + for tx in block_hash['transactions']: + if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']: + original_found = True + if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']: + double_found = True + assert_equal(original_found, True) + assert_equal(double_found, True) + + lastblockhash = spending_node.generate(1)[0] + + # check that neither transaction exists + block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(lastblockhash) + original_found = False + double_found = False + for tx in block_hash['transactions']: + if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']: + original_found = True + if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']: + double_found = True + assert_equal(original_found, False) + assert_equal(double_found, False) + if __name__ == '__main__': ListSinceBlockTest().main() -- cgit v1.2.3