aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/init.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2018-09-20 17:57:13 -0400
committerMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2018-09-20 17:57:20 -0400
commit2796c6e5ec9055545e987023b04eb5ebe64d5320 (patch)
tree4ab72e1699f43cb0e860a6f3f401644d59eaaeb3 /src/init.cpp
parent9a3a984bb884c1153866b64845db7300121966b3 (diff)
parent3ccfa34b32b7ed9d7bef05baa36827b4b262197e (diff)
downloadbitcoin-2796c6e5ec9055545e987023b04eb5ebe64d5320.tar.xz
Merge #14214: convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style ()
3ccfa34b32 convert C-style (void) parameter lists to C++ style () (Arvid Norberg) Pull request description: In C, an empty parameter list, `()`, means the function takes any arguments, and `(void)` means the function does not take any parameters. In C++, an empty parameter list means the function does not take any parameters. So, C++ still supports `(void)` parameter lists with the same semantics, why change to `()`? 1. removing the redundant `void` improves signal-to-noise ratio of the code 2. using `(void)` exposes a rare inconsistency in that a template taking a template `(T)` parameter list, cannot be instantiated with `T=void` Tree-SHA512: be2897b6c5e474873aa878ed6bac098382cd21866aec33752fe40b089a6331aa6263cae749aba1b4a41e8467f1a47086d32eb74abaf09927fd5a2f44a4b2109a
Diffstat (limited to 'src/init.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/init.cpp2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/init.cpp b/src/init.cpp
index 9386c46ce7..d10edbd8b6 100644
--- a/src/init.cpp
+++ b/src/init.cpp
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static void ThreadImport(std::vector<fs::path> vImportFiles)
* Ensure that Bitcoin is running in a usable environment with all
* necessary library support.
*/
-static bool InitSanityCheck(void)
+static bool InitSanityCheck()
{
if(!ECC_InitSanityCheck()) {
InitError("Elliptic curve cryptography sanity check failure. Aborting.");