From 1e99e205a84b73b4d95870aae09d9d81140065e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Towns Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:42:34 +1000 Subject: go back to leaf_version but different rationale --- bip-tapscript.mediawiki | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'bip-tapscript.mediawiki') diff --git a/bip-tapscript.mediawiki b/bip-tapscript.mediawiki index 120a617..e9c4278 100644 --- a/bip-tapscript.mediawiki +++ b/bip-tapscript.mediawiki @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The rules below only apply when validating a transaction input for which all of * The transaction input is a '''segregated witness spend''' (i.e., the scriptPubKey contains a witness program as defined in [https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki BIP141]). * It is a '''taproot spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., the witness version is 1, the witness program is 32 bytes, and it is not P2SH wrapped). * It is a '''script path spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., after removing the optional annex from the witness stack, two or more stack elements remain). -* The leaf version is 0 (i.e. the first byte of the last witness element after removing the optional annex is ''0xc0'' or ''0xc1''), marking it as a '''tapscript spend'''. +* The leaf version is ''0xc0'' (i.e. the first byte of the last witness element after removing the optional annex is ''0xc0'' or ''0xc1''), marking it as a '''tapscript spend'''. Validation of such inputs must be equivalent to performing the following steps in the specified order. # If the input is invalid due to BIP141 or bip-taproot, fail. -- cgit v1.2.3