From 1e99e205a84b73b4d95870aae09d9d81140065e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:42:34 +1000
Subject: go back to leaf_version but different rationale

---
 bip-tapscript.mediawiki | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'bip-tapscript.mediawiki')

diff --git a/bip-tapscript.mediawiki b/bip-tapscript.mediawiki
index 120a617..e9c4278 100644
--- a/bip-tapscript.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-tapscript.mediawiki
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The rules below only apply when validating a transaction input for which all of
 * The transaction input is a '''segregated witness spend''' (i.e., the scriptPubKey contains a witness program as defined in [https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki BIP141]).
 * It is a '''taproot spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., the witness version is 1, the witness program is 32 bytes, and it is not P2SH wrapped).
 * It is a '''script path spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., after removing the optional annex from the witness stack, two or more stack elements remain).
-* The leaf version is 0 (i.e. the first byte of the last witness element after removing the optional annex is ''0xc0'' or ''0xc1''), marking it as a '''tapscript spend'''.
+* The leaf version is ''0xc0'' (i.e. the first byte of the last witness element after removing the optional annex is ''0xc0'' or ''0xc1''), marking it as a '''tapscript spend'''.
 
 Validation of such inputs must be equivalent to performing the following steps in the specified order.
 # If the input is invalid due to BIP141 or bip-taproot, fail.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

