From d690408080bbf9c2442502abac9ac0a21db5a378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Black <brandonblack@bitgo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:49:58 -0700
Subject: BIP341/342: Clarify SigHash extensions

* Pull the definition of the extension in BIP342 to its own section
* Add a section to BIP341 on validating script path signatures
* Clarify that SigMsg does not produce the message being signed, but
a common portion of it
---
 bip-0341.mediawiki | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'bip-0341.mediawiki')

diff --git a/bip-0341.mediawiki b/bip-0341.mediawiki
index e856aa5..8af9c55 100644
--- a/bip-0341.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-0341.mediawiki
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ We first define a reusable common signature message calculation function, follow
 
 ==== Common signature message ====
 
-The function ''SigMsg(hash_type, ext_flag)'' computes the message being signed as a byte array. It is implicitly also a function of the spending transaction and the outputs it spends, but these are not listed to keep notation simple.
+The function ''SigMsg(hash_type, ext_flag)'' computes the common portion of the message being signed as a byte array. It is implicitly also a function of the spending transaction and the outputs it spends, but these are not listed to keep notation simple.
 
 The parameter ''hash_type'' is an 8-bit unsigned value. The <code>SIGHASH</code> encodings from the legacy script system are reused, including <code>SIGHASH_ALL</code>, <code>SIGHASH_NONE</code>, <code>SIGHASH_SINGLE</code>, and <code>SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY</code>. We define a new ''hashtype'' <code>SIGHASH_DEFAULT</code> (value ''0x00'') which results in signing over the whole transaction just as for <code>SIGHASH_ALL</code>. The following restrictions apply, which cause validation failure if violated:
 * Using any undefined ''hash_type'' (not ''0x00'', ''0x01'', ''0x02'', ''0x03'', ''0x81'', ''0x82'', or ''0x83''<ref>'''Why reject unknown ''hash_type'' values?''' By doing so, it is easier to reason about the worst case amount of signature hashing an implementation with adequate caching must perform.</ref>).
 * Using <code>SIGHASH_SINGLE</code> without a "corresponding output" (an output with the same index as the input being verified).
 
-The parameter ''ext_flag'' is an integer in range 0-127, and is used for indicating (in the message) that extensions are added at the end of the message<ref>'''What extensions use the ''ext_flag'' mechanism?''' [[bip-0342.mediawiki|BIP342]] reuses the same common signature message algorithm, but adds BIP342-specific data at the end, which is indicated using ''ext_flag = 1''.</ref>.
+The parameter ''ext_flag'' is an integer in range 0-127, and is used for indicating (in the message) that extensions are appended to the output of ''SigMsg()''<ref>'''What extensions use the ''ext_flag'' mechanism?''' [[bip-0342.mediawiki#common-signature-message-extension|BIP342]] reuses the same common signature message algorithm, but adds BIP342-specific data at the end, which is indicated using ''ext_flag = 1''.</ref>.
 
 If the parameters take acceptable values, the message is the concatenation of the following data, in order (with byte size of each item listed in parentheses). Numerical values in 2, 4, or 8-byte are encoded in little-endian.
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

