From 855eb2200406166032debb719a0eedf0ae4e3860 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Dashjr Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:55:44 +0000 Subject: BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103: License under BSD-2-Clause terms [Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:46:36 PM UTC] sipa: if you get a minute, can you give me at least a text-"verbal" ACK for some copyright license to put on BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103 please? is BSD-2-Clause okay? [Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:01 PM UTC] luke-jr: ACK on 2-clause BSD for 30,32,62,66,103 [Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:13 PM UTC] (and for any other BIPs I contributed to) --- bip-0066.mediawiki | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'bip-0066.mediawiki') diff --git a/bip-0066.mediawiki b/bip-0066.mediawiki index d2ab189..a47c82d 100644 --- a/bip-0066.mediawiki +++ b/bip-0066.mediawiki @@ -8,12 +8,17 @@ Status: Final Type: Standards Track Created: 2015-01-10 + License: BSD-2-Clause ==Abstract== This document specifies proposed changes to the Bitcoin transaction validity rules to restrict signatures to strict DER encoding. +==Copyright== + +This BIP is licensed under the 2-clause BSD license. + ==Motivation== Bitcoin's reference implementation currently relies on OpenSSL for signature validation, which means it is implicitly defining Bitcoin's block validity rules. Unfortunately, OpenSSL is not designed for consensus-critical behaviour (it does not guarantee bug-for-bug compatibility between versions), and thus changes to it can - and have - affected Bitcoin software. -- cgit v1.2.3