From e04e99c315dd4067e267b62f84c9eeffeeccf94e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 01:59:30 +0200
Subject: Include image for BIP42

---
 bip-0042.mediawiki | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'bip-0042.mediawiki')

diff --git a/bip-0042.mediawiki b/bip-0042.mediawiki
index a3fcdb2..d48bcf7 100644
--- a/bip-0042.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-0042.mediawiki
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The block number is divided by 210000 (the "apparent" subsidy halving interval i
 
 Despite the nice showoff of underhanded programming skills - we want Bitcoin to be well-specified. Otherwise, we're clearly in for a bumpy ride:
 
-<img src="http://bitcoin.sipa.be/inflation-small.png"></img>
+<img src="bip-0042/inflation.png"></img>
 
 Note that several other programming languages do not exhibit this behaviour, making new implementations likely to be slower and generally more bogus than Bitcoin Core. For example, Python unexpectedly returns 0 when shifting an integer beyond its size.
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3