From c5e1b25bc4d458edc1043bc3c63e3fa2007050fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:35:40 -0400
Subject: Archive Revision as of 21:29, 6 October 2013

https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=BIP_0001&oldid=41572
---
 bip-0001.mediawiki | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

(limited to 'bip-0001.mediawiki')

diff --git a/bip-0001.mediawiki b/bip-0001.mediawiki
index 433126b..b0662ca 100644
--- a/bip-0001.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-0001.mediawiki
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
+{{bip}}
+
 <pre>
   BIP: 1
   Title: BIP Purpose and Guidelines
-  Author: Amir Taaki <genjix@riseup.net>
-  Status: Active
+  Status: Accepted
   Type: Standards Track
   Created: 19-08-2011
 </pre>
@@ -19,15 +20,15 @@ Because the BIPs are maintained as text files in a versioned repository, their r
 
 There are three kinds of BIP:
 
-* A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations, such as a change to the network protocol, a change in block or transaction validitity rules, or any change or addition that affects the interoperability of applications using Bitcoin.
+* A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations, such as a change to the network protocol, a change in block or transaction validity rules, or any change or addition that affects the interoperability of applications using Bitcoin.
 * An Informational BIP describes a Bitcoin design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Bitcoin community, but does not propose a new feature. Informational BIPs do not necessarily represent a Bitcoin community consensus or recommendation, so users and implementors are free to ignore Informational BIPs or follow their advice.
 * A Process BIP describes a process surrounding Bitcoin, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process. Process BIPs are like Standards Track BIPs but apply to areas other than the Bitcoin protocol itself. They may propose an implementation, but not to Bitcoin's codebase; they often require community consensus; unlike Informational BIPs, they are more than recommendations, and users are typically not free to ignore them. Examples include procedures, guidelines, changes to the decision-making process, and changes to the tools or environment used in Bitcoin development. Any meta-BIP is also considered a Process BIP.
 
 ==BIP Work Flow==
 
-The BIP editors assign BIP numbers and change their status. Please send all BIP-related email to <BIPs@Bitcoin.org> (no cross-posting please). Also see BIP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow below.
+The BIP editors assign BIP numbers and change their status. Please send all BIP-related email to <gmaxwell@gmail.com> (no cross-posting please). Also see BIP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow below.
 
-The BIP process begins with a new idea for Bitcoin. It is highly recommended that a single BIP contain a single key proposal or new idea. Small enhancements or patches often don't need a BIP and can be injected into the Bitcoin development work flow with a patch submission to the Bitcoin issue tracker. The more focussed the BIP, the more successful it tends to be. The BIP editor reserves the right to reject BIP proposals if they appear too unfocussed or too broad. If in doubt, split your BIP into several well-focussed ones.
+The BIP process begins with a new idea for Bitcoin. It is highly recommended that a single BIP contain a single key proposal or new idea. Small enhancements or patches often don't need a BIP and can be injected into the Bitcoin development work flow with a patch submission to the Bitcoin issue tracker. The more focused the BIP, the more successful it tends to be. The BIP editor reserves the right to reject BIP proposals if they appear too unfocused or too broad. If in doubt, split your BIP into several well-focused ones.
 
 Each BIP must have a champion -- someone who writes the BIP using the style and format described below, shepherds the discussions in the appropriate forums, and attempts to build community consensus around the idea. The BIP champion (a.k.a. Author) should first attempt to ascertain whether the idea is BIP-able. Posting to the [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=6.0 Development&Technical Discussion] forum or the [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net] mailing list is the best way to go about this.
 
@@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ Vetting an idea publicly before going as far as writing a BIP is meant to save t
 
 Once the champion has asked the Bitcoin community as to whether an idea has any chance of acceptance, a draft BIP should be presented to [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net]. This gives the author a chance to flesh out the draft BIP to make properly formatted, of high quality, and to address initial concerns about the proposal.
 
-Following a discussion, the proposal should be sent to the Bitcoin-dev list with the draft BIP and the BIP editors <BIPs@Bitcoin.org>. This draft must be written in BIP style as described below, else it will be sent back without further regard until proper formatting rules are followed.
+Following a discussion, the proposal should be sent to the Bitcoin-dev list with the draft BIP and the BIP editors <gmaxwell@gmail.com>. This draft must be written in BIP style as described below, else it will be sent back without further regard until proper formatting rules are followed.
 
 If the BIP editor approves, he will assign the BIP a number, label it as Standards Track, Informational, or Process, give it status "Draft", and create and create a page for it on the [[Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals|Bitcoin Wiki]]. The BIP editor will not unreasonably deny a BIP. Reasons for denying BIP status include duplication of effort, being technically unsound, not providing proper motivation or addressing backwards compatibility, or not in keeping with the Bitcoin philosophy.
 
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ BIPs can also be superseded by a different BIP, rendering the original obsolete.
 
 The possible paths of the status of BIPs are as follows:
 
-[[File:bip-0001-1.png]]
+[[File:BIP-0001-Process.png]]
 
 Some Informational and Process BIPs may also have a status of "Active" if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. BIP 1 (this BIP).
 
@@ -69,7 +70,7 @@ Each BIP should have the following parts:
 
 * Abstract -- a short (~200 word) description of the technical issue being addressed.
 
-* Copyright/public domain -- Each BIP must either be explicitly labelled as placed in the public domain (see this BIP as an example) or licensed under the Open Publication License [7].
+* Copyright/public domain -- Each BIP must either be explicitly labelled as placed in the public domain (see this BIP as an example) or licensed under the Open Publication License.
 
 * Specification -- The technical specification should describe the syntax and semantics of any new language feature. The specification should be detailed enough to allow competing, interoperable implementations for any of the current Bitcoin platforms (Satoshi, BitcoinJ, bitcoin-js, libbitcoin).
 
@@ -139,10 +140,10 @@ BIPs may include auxiliary files such as diagrams. Such files must be named BIP-
 
 It occasionally becomes necessary to transfer ownership of BIPs to a new champion. In general, we'd like to retain the original author as a co-author of the transferred BIP, but that's really up to the original author. A good reason to transfer ownership is because the original author no longer has the time or interest in updating it or following through with the BIP process, or has fallen off the face of the 'net (i.e. is unreachable or not responding to email). A bad reason to transfer ownership is because you don't agree with the direction of the BIP. We try to build consensus around a BIP, but if that's not possible, you can always submit a competing BIP.
 
-If you are interested in assuming ownership of a BIP, send a message asking to take over, addressed to both the original author and the BIP editor <BIPs@bitcoin.org>. If the original author doesn't respond to email in a timely manner, the BIP editor will make a unilateral decision (it's not like such decisions can't be reversed :).
+If you are interested in assuming ownership of a BIP, send a message asking to take over, addressed to both the original author and the BIP editor <gmaxwell@gmail.com>. If the original author doesn't respond to email in a timely manner, the BIP editor will make a unilateral decision (it's not like such decisions can't be reversed :).
 BIP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow
 
-A BIP editor must subscribe to the <BIPs@bitcoin.org> list. All BIP-related correspondence should be sent (or CC'd) to <BIPs@bitcoin.org> (but please do not cross-post!).
+A BIP editor must subscribe to the <gmaxwell@gmail.com> list. All BIP-related correspondence should be sent (or CC'd) to <gmaxwell@gmail.com> (but please do not cross-post!).
 
 For each new BIP that comes in an editor does the following:
 
@@ -170,3 +171,4 @@ The editors don't pass judgement on BIPs. We merely do the administrative & edit
 
 This document was derived heavily from Python's PEP-0001. In many places text was simply copied and modified. Although the PEP-0001 text was written by Barry Warsaw, Jeremy Hylton, and David Goodger, they are not responsible for its use in the Bitcoin Improvement Process, and should not be bothered with technical questions specific to Bitcoin or the BIP process. Please direct all comments to the Bitcoin editors or the forums at bitcointalk.org.
 
+[[Category:BIP|A]]
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

