From 97655c211a7454b4bcc01acefd4b88f979e7853f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Dashjr Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:49:37 +0000 Subject: bip-biprevised: Clarify licensing of literal code inclusion in BIPs --- bip-biprevised.mediawiki | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bip-biprevised.mediawiki b/bip-biprevised.mediawiki index 0774962..18ec1dd 100644 --- a/bip-biprevised.mediawiki +++ b/bip-biprevised.mediawiki @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ New BIPs may be accepted with the following licenses: * [https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal] * [http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html GNU All-Permissive License] +In addition, it is recommended that literal code included in the BIP be available under the same license terms as the project it modifies, when that license is acceptable within a BIP. For example, literal code intended for Bitcoin Core would ideally be dual-licensed under the MIT license terms (listed below, as not recommended but acceptable) as well as one of the above with the rest of the BIP text. + ====Not recommented, but acceptable licenses==== * [http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Apache License, version 2.0] -- cgit v1.2.3